Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36372844›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2023

Assessing the Repeatability of Multi-Frequency Multi-Layer Brain Network Topologies Across Alternative Researcher's Choice Paths.

Stavros I Dimitriadis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stavros I DimitriadisDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. stidimitriadis@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0000-5392

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K004360/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the neuroscience community on the advantages of multilayer functional brain networks. Researchers usually treated different frequencies separately at distinct functional brain networks. However, there is strong evidence that these networks share complementary information while their interdependencies could reveal novel findings. For this purpose, neuroscientists adopt multilayer networks, which can be described mathematically as an extension of trivial single-layer networks. Multilayer networks have become popular in neuroscience due to their advantage to integrate different sources of information. Here, Ι will focus on the multi-frequency multilayer functional connectivity analysis on resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) recordings. However, constructing a multilayer network depends on selecting multiple pre-processing steps that can affect the final network topology. Here, I analyzed the rs-fMRI dataset from a single human performing scanning over a period of 18 months (84 scans in total), and the rs-fMRI dataset containing 25 subjects with 3 repeat scans. I focused on assessing the reproducibility of multi-frequency multilayer topologies exploring the effect of two filtering methods for extracting frequencies from BOLD activity, three connectivity estimators, with or without a topological filtering scheme, and two spatial scales. Finally, I untangled specific combinations of researchers' choices that yield consistently brain networks with repeatable topologies, giving me the chance to recommend best practices over consistent topologies.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetReproducibility of ResultsBrain connectivityFunctional connectivityMultilayer networksNetwork topologiesReproducibilityTest–retest studyTopological filtering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.