Trial reportJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2022
Evaluation of molecular signatures in the urinary bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinomas: a prospective controlled clinical study.
Trial report in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Implications of ELK1 in Solid Tumors: A Narrative Review.Cells · 2025Review
- 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) with or without alpha-blockers (α-B) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia do NOT lower the risk of incident Bladder Cancer: United States insurance claims data.World journal of urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrothelial carcinomas (UC) can be either in the upper or in the lower urinary tract or both. Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is more common than upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This research was designed to study the difference between UBC and UTUC using the molecular pathways including (MAPK/ERK) pathway, cell cycle regulating genes, and oncogenic genes.
methodsTo study the discrepancy between UBC and UTUC, a prospective trial was carried out for 31 radical cystectomy and 19 nephrouretrectomy fresh-frozen specimens of UBC and UTUC patients, respectively. The expression level of mRNA of eight genes namely EGFR, ELK1, c-fos, survivin, TP53, RB1, FGFR3, and hTERT was assessed in normal adjacent tissues, UTUC, and UBC by RT-PCR.
resultsComparison between UTUC and UBC regarding the expression level of mRNA of the EGFR, ELK1, c-fos, survivin, TP53, and FGFR3 had significant difference (p-value < 0.001), while the expression level of RB1 and hTERT level had no significance. Sensitivity/specificity of EGFR, Elk1, c-fos, survivin, TP53, and FGFR3 was 0.78/0.90, 0.84/0.90, 0.84/0.80, 0.84/0.96, 0.94/0.93, and 0.89/0.93, respectively, to differentiate between UTUC and UBC.
conclusionsDespite the fact that UTUC and UBC share the same origin, there is a clear evidence that there is a molecular difference between them. This molecular difference could be the reason that UTUC is more aggressive than UBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.