Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36372363›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2023

Reduction in severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients owing to heterologous third and fourth-dose vaccines during the periods of delta and omicron predominance in Thailand.

Kannikar Intawong, Suwat Chariyalertsak, Kittipan Chalom, Thanachol Wonghirundecha, Woravut Kowatcharakul, Pisittawoot Ayood, Aksara Thongprachum, Narain Chotirosniramit, Kajohnsak Noppakun, Krit Khwanngern and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Update on Omicron variant and its threat to vulnerable populations.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kannikar IntawongFaculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Suwat ChariyalertsakFaculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Electronic address: suwat.c@cmu.ac.th.
Kittipan ChalomChiang Mai Provincial Health Office, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thanachol WonghirundechaChiang Mai Provincial Health Office, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Woravut KowatcharakulSansai Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pisittawoot AyoodChiang Mai Provincial Health Office, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Aksara ThongprachumFaculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Narain ChotirosniramitFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kajohnsak NoppakunFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Krit KhwanngernFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Worachet TeacharakNakornping Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Prapon PiamanantNakornping Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pimpinan KhammawanNakornping Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · THMinistry of Public Health · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has evolved quickly, with different variants of concern resulting in the need for countries to offer booster vaccinations. Although studies have assessed homologous schedules in detail, the effectiveness of heterologous booster vaccine schedules against severity and mortality with newer variants remains to be explored fully.

methodsUtilizing a Hospital Information System for COVID-19 established in Chiang Mai, Thailand, we conducted a cohort study by linking patient-level data on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases to the national immunization records, during delta-predominant and omicron-predominant periods.

resultsCompared to omicron, COVID-19 cases during the delta period were 10 times more likely to have severe outcomes and in-hospital deaths. During omicron, a third vaccine dose had an 89% reduced risk of both severe COVID-19 and death. The third dose received 14-90 days before the date of the positive test showed the highest protection (93%). Severe outcomes were not observed with the third dose during delta, and the fourth dose during the omicron period. All the vaccine types used for boosting in Thailand offered similar protection against severe COVID-19.

conclusionBooster doses provided a very high level of protection against severe COVID-19 outcomes and deaths. Booster campaigns should focus on improving coverage by utilizing all available vaccines to ensure optimal protection.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCohort StudiesHumansPandemicsThailandVaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMortalitySARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2 variants

Identifiers

PMID36372363
PMCPMC9650516
OpenAlexW4308924427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.