Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36372205›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2023

Early gut microbiota intervention in premature infants: Application perspectives.

Quanhang Xiang, Xudong Yan, Wei Shi, Huiping Li, Kai Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of mother's own milkMicrobiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  20. Persistent reduction ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quanhang XiangShenzhen Institute of Respiratory Diseases, the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Xudong YanDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Wei ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Huiping LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the first affiliated hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China; The First Affiliated Hospital (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Kai ZhouShenzhen Institute of Respiratory Diseases, the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China; The First Affiliated Hospital (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: zhouk@mail.sustech.edu.cn.
Jinan University · CNSouthern University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth is the leading cause of death in children under the age of five. One of the major factors contributing to the high risk of diseases and deaths in premature infants is the incomplete development of the intestinal immune system. The gut microbiota has been widely recognized as a critical factor in promoting the development and function of the intestinal immune system after birth. However, the gut microbiota of premature infants is at high risk of dysbiosis, which is highly associated with adverse effects on the development and education of the early life immune system. Early intervention can modulate the colonization and development of gut microbiota and has a long-term influence on the development of the intestinal immune system. AIM OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the characterization, interconnection, and underlying mechanism of gut microbiota and intestinal innate immunity in premature infants, and to discuss the status, applicability, safety, and prospects of different intervention strategies in premature infants, thus providing an overview and outlook of the current applications and remaining gaps of early intervention strategies in premature infants. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: This review is focused on three key concepts. Firstly, the gut microbiota of premature infants is at high risk of dysbiosis, resulting in dysfunctional intestinal immune system processes. Secondly, contributing roles of early intervention have been observed in improving the intestinal environment and promoting gut microbiota colonization, which is significant in the development and function of gut immunity in premature infants. Thirdly, different strategies of early intervention, such as probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and nutrients, show different safety, applicability, and outcome in premature infants, and the underlying mechanism is complex and poorly understood.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePremature BirthChildDysbiosisFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureEarly interventionFecal microbiota transplantationIntestinal innate immune systemNutrientsPremature infantsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID36372205
PMCPMC10491976
OpenAlexW4308952026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.