ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
A candidate reference method and multiple commutable control materials for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Teaching practice of undergraduate graduation projects in clinical laboratory science integrating liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and external quality assessment].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Article
- A candidate reference method and multiple commutable control materials for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of the current study was to establish a reliable candidate reference method for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] measurement and to assess the commutability of multiple control materials among liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods.
methodsSerum 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [25(OH)D2] and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] together with spiked internal standards were extracted with a one-step approach and then analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The commutability assessment for 25(OH)D was conducted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP14-A3 protocol. 25(OH)D concentrations in 5 levels of unprocessed serum pools, 7 levels of serum pools spiked with 25(OH)D3 or 25(OH)D2, 3 levels of commercial control materials, 2 levels of spiked bovine serum, and 4 levels of external quality assessment (EQA) materials were measured along with 30 single-donor samples using the candidate reference method and two routine LC-MS/MS methods.
resultsThe candidate reference method could separate 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 from 14 potential interfering compounds completely within a 9-min analysis time. Good method precision was obtained, and measurement results on certified reference material NIST SRM 972a were within the uncertainty of the certified values. All candidate materials were assessed commutable for LC-MS/MS methods.
conclusionsThe candidate reference method for serum 25(OH)D measurement is precise, accurate, and robust against interferences and can provide an accuracy base for routine methods. The multiple alternative control materials with commutability among LC-MS/MS methods will facilitate the further standardization for serum 25(OH)D measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.