ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
Accompanying a semi-nested PCR assay to support histopathology findings of fungal keratitis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded corneal samples.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accompanying a semi-nested PCR assay to support histopathology findings of fungal keratitis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded corneal samples.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFungal species are responsible for 40%-50% of all microbial keratitis cases. Due to the low amount of extracted DNA in ocular Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, selecting a reliable molecular method is a substantial issue in this field.
methodsSixty-six samples were collected via the penetrating keratoplasty (PK) technique. Histopathology assays were performed using hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and periodic acid Schiff (PAS) staining methods. The ITS1/ITS4 and ITS1/ITS2 primer pairs were used in a semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to target the universal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Some PCR results were validated through sequencing.
resultsFungal DNA was detected in 44 of 66 samples (66.7%), and histopathology was positive for 41 of 66 samples (62.1%). Of 41 histopathologically proven fungal-positive cases, 39 were PCR-positive (95%). Moreover, of 44 PCR-positive samples, 39 (88.6%) were histopathology-positive, and 5 (11.3%) were histopathology-negative. Totally in 39 cases (59%), both histopathology and PCR yielded positive results. The Kappa agreement rate between the two diagnostic methods, including histopathology and PCR, was 0.77. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and false predictive value were reported as 88.64%, 90.9%, 95.12%, and 80%, respectively.
conclusionAs we reached the acceptable Kappa agreement rate, we concluded that applying the semi-nested PCR assay is a promising method for supporting the evidence by histopathology. Finally, we suggest targeting more specific gene regions using primer pairs that amplify smaller amplicon sizes and surveying novel molecular methods such as NGS to achieve higher sensitivity and Kappa agreement rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.