Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36371742›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2022

Optimizing pain management following kidney stone surgery: can we avoid narcotics?

Matthew Demasi, Michal Segall, Amanda Mengotto, Pablo Cuartas, Nathan Feiertag, Justin Loloi, Jordan Ahn, Mimi Kim, Melissa Laudano, Joshua Stern and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The efficacy of 0.25% bupivacaine infiltration in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in singular stone of the pelvis: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Strategies for optimizing pain management after ureteroscopy.Translational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current advances in pain regimens for percutaneous nephrolithotomy A comprehensive review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew Demasi *Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Michal Segall *Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9423-6070
Amanda MengottoAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Pablo CuartasAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Nathan FeiertagAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Justin LoloiDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Jordan AhnBoston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Mimi KimAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Melissa LaudanoAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Joshua SternDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Kara WattsAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. kwatts@montefiore.org.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpioids are often used to manage postoperative pain. Non-narcotic alternatives have increasingly been used to reduce opioid usage. We conducted an open-label randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare non-opioid to opioid therapy for pain management after nephrolithiasis surgery.

methodsPatients undergoing elective ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy between July 2018 and May 2021 were randomized to receive ketorolac (non-opioid) or oxycodone-acetaminophen (opioid). Each patient was surveyed one week postoperatively to assess pain outcomes. Patient demographics, surgical variables, number of pills used, constipation, and adverse events were also assessed. We evaluated whether non-opioid analgesia was non-inferior to opioid analgesia for postoperative pain, assuming a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 in pain score between groups.

resultsAnalyses were based on 90 patients with postoperative pain data: 44 in the ketorolac group and 46 in the oxycodone-acetaminophen group. The groups were similar regarding demographics, type of surgery, ureteral stent placement, and stone burden. Non-inferiority of non-opioids compared to opioids was demonstrated for all outcomes. At follow-up, the average pain scores were 3.20 ± 1.94 (SD) in the non-opioid group and 4.17 ± 1.84 in the opioid group (difference =  - 0.96; 95% CI: - 1.76, - 0.17, p = 0.018). The mean proportions of unused pills were similar between groups (p = 0.47) as were rates of constipation (p = 0.32).

conclusionsNon-opioid analgesia was non-inferior to opioid analgesia in pain management after kidney stone surgery. This trial contributes to the evidence that non-opioid analgesics should be considered an effective option for pain management following non-invasive urologic procedures.

Indexed as

Analgesics, Non-NarcoticKidney CalculiAnalgesics, OpioidConstipationHumansKetorolacNarcoticsPain ManagementPostoperative PainAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidKetorolacNarcoticsNephrolithiasisNSAIDsOpioidsPCNLURS

Identifiers

PMID36371742
OpenAlexW4308891620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.