Observational studyEye (London, England)2023
Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of open globe injuries in a North Spain population: a 10-year review.
Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overnight vs. daytime surgical repair in open globe injuries and their association with long-term visual outcomes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Open globe injuries: clinical features and risk factors at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of open globe injuries (OGIs) treated in a tertiary hospital and analyse predictors of visual outcome.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included all patients with OGIs admitted to Cruces University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. The descriptive analysis included demographic data, type of injury classified as "rupture", "penetration", "perforation", or "intraocular foreign body", trauma mechanism and setting, injury zone, Ocular Trauma Score, delay to surgery, length of hospital stay, antibiotic prophylaxis, initial and final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), complications and further surgery. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed to identify prognostic factors, based on final BCVA.
resultsOverall, 207 OGI cases were reported. The most common type of injuries were ruptures caused by domestic falls. Notably, 44.4% of eyes developed phthisis bulbi. In the univariate analysis, the following variables were significantly linked to visual outcome: age > 60 years, "rupture", "fall", posterior and/or combined zones of injury, lens damage, retinal/choroidal detachment, initial BCVA of no light perception, and Ocular Trauma Score ≤ 2 (p < 0.001). Delay to surgery, length of stay and further surgery did not have prognostic value. In the logistic regression, initial BCVA of no light perception (p < 0.001) and injury zone III (p = 0.005) remained significant predictors of poor outcome.
conclusionsIn the population studied, most OGIs were caused by domestic falls usually affecting elderly patients with comorbidities. Visual outcome depended on patients´ specific characteristics and the nature of the trauma itself, whereas environmental factors failed to show any prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.