Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36371518›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Assessment of the rhizosphere fungi and bacteria recruited by sugarcane during smut invasion.

Mingzheng Duan, Lingqiang Wang, Xiupeng Song, Xiaoqiu Zhang, Zeping Wang, Jingchao Lei, Meixin Yan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbial community composition ofOpen life sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mingzheng DuanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, 100 Daxue Rd, Nanning, 530004, China.
Lingqiang WangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, 100 Daxue Rd, Nanning, 530004, China.
Xiupeng SongSugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi); Ministry of Agriculture, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning, 530007, China.
Xiaoqiu ZhangSugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi); Ministry of Agriculture, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning, 530007, China.
Zeping WangSugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi); Ministry of Agriculture, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning, 530007, China.
Jingchao LeiSugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi); Ministry of Agriculture, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning, 530007, China.
Meixin YanSugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Sugarcane Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi); Ministry of Agriculture, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning, 530007, China. 574252968@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-5689
Sugarcane Research Center (Brazil) · BRGuangxi University · CN

Funding

Fund of GXAAS 2021YT007Fund of GXAAS 31960521National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFD1000503Natural Science Foundation of China 31960521STS KFJ-STS-QYZD-199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whip smut is one of the most serious and widely spread sugarcane diseases. Plant-associated microbes play various roles in conferring advantages to the host plant. Understanding the microbes associated with sugarcane roots will help develop strategies for the biocontrol of smut. Therefore, the present study explored microbe-mediated sugarcane response to smut invasion via 16S rRNA and ITS metabarcoding survey of the rhizosphere soils of resistant and susceptible sugarcane varieties. The bacterial and fungal diversity in the rhizosphere soils differed between the resistant and susceptible varieties. The bacterial genera Sphingomonas, Microcoleus_Es-Yyy1400, Marmoricola, Reyranella, Promicromonospora, Iamia, Phenylobacterium, Aridibacter, Actinophytocola, and Edaphobacter and one fungal genus Cyphellophora were found associated with smut resistance in sugarcane. Detailed analysis revealed that the majority of bacteria were beneficial, including the actinomycete Marmoricola and Iamia and Reyranella with denitrification activity. Analysis of bacterial network interaction showed that three major groups interacted during smut invasion. Meanwhile, seven of these genera appeared to interact and promote each other's growth. Finally, functional annotation based on the Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa (FAPROTAX) database predicted that the abundant bacteria are dominated by oxygenic photoautotrophy, photoautotrophy, and phototrophy functions, which may be related to smut resistance in sugarcane. The present study thus provides new insights into the dynamics of the sugarcane rhizosphere microbial community during smut invasion.

Indexed as

ActinomycetalesSaccharumUstilaginalesBacteriaRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil16 s rRNAITSMetabarcodingRhizosphere soilSoil microbial diversitySporisorium scitamineumSugarcane smut

Identifiers

PMID36371518
PMCPMC9944363
OpenAlexW4308841864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.