ArticleScientific reports2022
An in-depth evaluation of sample and measurement induced influences on static contact angle measurements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rheological Properties of Nine Commercially Available Endodontic Sealers by Substrate and Temperature: A Comparative In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Drop-Location-Insensitive Droplet-Based Electricity Generator Using Polydimethylsiloxane Slippery Covalently Attached Liquid Coatings.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Fabrication and Characterization of a Porous TiOACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Investigation of Thin Silicone Films on Opaque Solid Surfaces Using Coherent Raman Scattering Imaging.Applied spectroscopy · 2025Article
- Artificial Tendons' Responsiveness to Mechanical Stress and Biological Performance Following Cork Extract Functionalization.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Surface Characteristics of Subtractively and Additively Manufactured Restorative Materials for Definitive Restorations.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Does Extreme Wettability Matter: The Effect of Copper Wettability on Infection Spread through Hospital Surfaces.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Nanostructured Surfaces with Plasmonic Activity and Superhydrophobicity: Review of Fabrication Strategies and Applications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Inhibition of Enzyme and Bacteria Activities in Diabetic Ulcer-like Scenarios via WAAPV-Loaded Electrospun Fibers.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Physicochemical and Functional Properties and Storage Stability of Chitosan-Starch Films Containing Micellar Nano/Microstructures with Turmeric and Hibiscus Extracts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Static contact angle measurements are one of the most popular methods to analyze the wetting behavior of materials of any kind. Although this method is readily applicable without the need of sophisticated machinery, the results obtained for the very same material may vary strongly. The sensitivity of the measurement against environmental conditions, sample preparation and measurement conduction is a main factor for inconsistent results. Since often no detailed measurement protocols exist alongside published data, contact angle values as well as elaborated wetting studies do not allow for any comparison. This paper therefore aims to discuss possible influences on static contact angle measurements and to experimentally demonstrate the extent of these effects. Sample storage conditions, cleaning procedures, droplet volume, water grade and droplet application as well as the influence of evaporation on the static contact angle are investigated in detail. Especially sample storage led to differences in the contact angle up to 60%. Depending on the wetting state, evaporation can reduce the contact angle by 30-50% within 10 min in dry atmospheres. Therefore, this paper reviews an existing approach for a climate chamber and introduces a new measuring setup based on these results. It allows for the observation of the wetting behavior for several minutes by successfully suppressing evaporation without negatively affecting the surface prior to measurement by exposure to high humidity environments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.