Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36371459›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

An in-depth evaluation of sample and measurement induced influences on static contact angle measurements.

Sarah Marie Lößlein, Rolf Merz, Daniel Wyn Müller, Michael Kopnarski, Frank Mücklich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fabrication and Characterization of a Porous TiOACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Marie LößleinChair of Functional Materials, Department of Material Science and Engineering, Campus D3 3, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany. sarah.loesslein@uni-saarland.de.
Rolf MerzInstitute for Surface and Thin Film Analysis, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Daniel Wyn MüllerChair of Functional Materials, Department of Material Science and Engineering, Campus D3 3, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Michael KopnarskiInstitute for Surface and Thin Film Analysis, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Frank MücklichChair of Functional Materials, Department of Material Science and Engineering, Campus D3 3, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 415956642Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 435334669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Static contact angle measurements are one of the most popular methods to analyze the wetting behavior of materials of any kind. Although this method is readily applicable without the need of sophisticated machinery, the results obtained for the very same material may vary strongly. The sensitivity of the measurement against environmental conditions, sample preparation and measurement conduction is a main factor for inconsistent results. Since often no detailed measurement protocols exist alongside published data, contact angle values as well as elaborated wetting studies do not allow for any comparison. This paper therefore aims to discuss possible influences on static contact angle measurements and to experimentally demonstrate the extent of these effects. Sample storage conditions, cleaning procedures, droplet volume, water grade and droplet application as well as the influence of evaporation on the static contact angle are investigated in detail. Especially sample storage led to differences in the contact angle up to 60%. Depending on the wetting state, evaporation can reduce the contact angle by 30-50% within 10 min in dry atmospheres. Therefore, this paper reviews an existing approach for a climate chamber and introduces a new measuring setup based on these results. It allows for the observation of the wetting behavior for several minutes by successfully suppressing evaporation without negatively affecting the surface prior to measurement by exposure to high humidity environments.

Identifiers

PMID36371459
PMCPMC9653445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.