Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36371195›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2022

Tissue dissociation for single-cell and single-nuclei RNA sequencing for low amounts of input material.

Gordon Wiegleb, Susanne Reinhardt, Andreas Dahl, Nico Posnien

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Starve-Feed Cycles Direct Quiescence to Proliferation Transitions inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gordon WieglebDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Goettingen, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077, Goettingen, Germany.
Susanne ReinhardtCenter for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), DRESDEN-concept Genome Center, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 105, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Andreas DahlCenter for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), DRESDEN-concept Genome Center, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 105, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Nico PosnienDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Goettingen, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077, Goettingen, Germany. nposnie@gwdg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-5595
Center for Systems Biology Dresden · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PO 1648/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent technological advances opened the opportunity to simultaneously study gene expression for thousands of individual cells on a genome-wide scale. The experimental accessibility of such single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) approaches allowed gaining insights into the cell type composition of heterogeneous tissue samples of animal model systems and emerging models alike. A major prerequisite for a successful application of the method is the dissociation of complex tissues into individual cells, which often requires large amounts of input material and harsh mechanical, chemical and temperature conditions. However, the availability of tissue material may be limited for small animals, specific organs, certain developmental stages or if samples need to be acquired from collected specimens. Therefore, we evaluated different dissociation protocols to obtain single cells from small tissue samples of Drosophila melanogaster eye-antennal imaginal discs.

resultsWe show that a combination of mechanical and chemical dissociation resulted in sufficient high-quality cells. As an alternative, we tested protocols for the isolation of single nuclei, which turned out to be highly efficient for fresh and frozen tissue samples. Eventually, we performed scRNAseq and single-nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) to show that the best protocols for both methods successfully identified relevant cell types. At the same time, snRNAseq resulted in less artificial gene expression that is caused by rather harsh dissociation conditions needed to obtain single cells for scRNAseq. A direct comparison of scRNAseq and snRNAseq data revealed that both datasets share biologically relevant genes among the most variable genes, and we showed differences in the relative contribution of the two approaches to identified cell types.

conclusionWe present two dissociation protocols that allow isolating single cells and single nuclei, respectively, from low input material. Both protocols resulted in extraction of high-quality RNA for subsequent scRNAseq or snRNAseq applications. If tissue availability is limited, we recommend the snRNAseq procedure of fresh or frozen tissue samples as it is perfectly suited to obtain thorough insights into cellular diversity of complex tissue.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterEye-antennal discSingle-cell RNAseqSingle-nuclei RNAseq

Identifiers

PMID36371195
PMCPMC9652833
OpenAlexW4308841998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.