ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage2023
Reproducibility of T
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging parameters and histopathologic features for disease-free survival in locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Advances in cartilage imaging techniques.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Rapid and robust quantitative cartilage assessment for the clinical setting: deep learning-enhanced accelerated T2 mapping.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Accelerated motion-robust abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping using diamond radial sampling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Multiparametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of skeletal muscle in CKD.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2025Article
- Capturing deep partial-thickness cartilage loss with semiquantitative scoring: A supplemented MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (sMOAKS).Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
- Transformative approaches for effective clinical trials to reduce the disease burden of osteoarthritis.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2025Review
- Novel spin-lock time sampling strategies for improved reproducibility in quantitative T1ρ mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Cartilage compositional MRI-a narrative review of technical development and clinical applications over the past three decades.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the multi-vendor multi-site reproducibility of two-dimensional (2D) multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) T
methodsPhantoms and volunteers (n = 5 from each site, n = 20 in total) were scanned on four 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) systems from four sites and three vendors (Siemens, General Electric, and Phillips). Two traveling volunteers (3 knees) scanned at all 4 sites at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Data was transferred to one site for centralized processing. Coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated to evaluate reproducibility.
resultsFor baseline 2D MESE T
conclusionThis study demonstrated excellent intra-site reproducibility of 2D MESE T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.