ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Utilizing Public Molecular Biological Databases for CCN Family Research.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do not overwork: cellular communication network factor 3 for life in cartilage.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023Review
- CCN proteins: opportunities for clinical studies-a personal perspective.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classically, scientific research has been driven by hypotheses based on personal inspiration and intuition against the background of personal knowledge. In contrast, scientists have recently proposed that scientific research should basically be driven by data, meaning big data yielded by preliminary omic analyses in this context. A genuine hypothesis-driven strategy is usually exciting but occasionally ends up with negative conclusions, whereas a data-driven approach is less exciting and cost-consuming but produces significant outcomes in most cases. Here, we should be aware that a number of bioscientific resources provide a variety of big data free of charge. Therefore, one of the most effective research strategies is to construct a research question based on comprehensive knowledge derived not only from inside information, but also from the analysis of data available to everybody. However, a classical scientist without a sufficient bioinformatic background may hesitate in dealing with information supplied through the Internet. This chapter is aimed at CCN family researchers who do not possess specific bioinformatic knowledge and/or huge grants-in-aid, in order to assist them in developing their research by taking advantage of the scientific treasury open to the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36370350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.