ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Using SILAC to Develop Quantitative Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) Proteomic Methods.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data acquisition approaches for single cell proteomics.Proteomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins are integral to biological systems and functions. Identifying and quantifying proteins can therefore offer systems-wide insights into protein-protein interactions, cellular signaling, and biological pathway activity. The use of quantitative proteomics has become a method of choice for identifying and quantifying proteins in complex matrices. Proteomics allows researchers to survey hundreds to thousands of proteins in a less biased manner than classical antibody-based protein capture strategies. Typically, discovery approaches have used data-dependent acquisition (DDA) methods, but this approach suffers from stochasticity that compromises quantitation. Recent developments in data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics workflows enable proteomic profiling of thousands of samples with increased peak picking consistency making it an excellent candidate for discovering and assessing biomarkers in clinical samples. However, quantitation of peptides from DIA datasets is computationally intensive, and guidelines on how to establish DIA methods are lacking. Method development and optimization require novel tools to visualize and filter DIA datasets appropriately. Here, a protocol and novel script workflow for the optimization of quantitative DIA methods using stable isotope labeling of amino acids in culture (SILAC) are presented. This protocol includes steps for cell growth and labeling, peptide digestion and preparation, and optimization of quantitative DIA methods. In addition, important steps for (1) computational analysis to identify and quantify peptides, (2) data visualizations to identify the linear abundance ranges for all peptides in the sample, and (3) descriptions of how to find high confidence quantitation abundance thresholds are described herein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.