Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36370263›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2022

A Review of Binge-Eating Disorder in Black Women: Treatment Recommendations and Implications for Healthcare Providers.

Rachel W Goode, C Kashonna Webster, Rebecca E Gwira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel W GoodeSchool of Social Work and Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 325 Pittsboro Street, CB #3550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. rwgoode@email.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1358-3917
C Kashonna WebsterHarbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Rebecca E GwiraDepartment of Counseling and Psychological Services, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Developing a Culturally-Relevant Digital Health Intervention to Treat Binge Eating and ObesityK23DK129832 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GOODE, RACHEL W. · 2021 to 2025
$887k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK129832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe review relevant factors and barriers to care for binge-eating disorder (BED) in Black women. We examine evidence for the treatment of BED and provide recommendations to improve cultural relevance for assessing and treating BED in Black women. RECENT

findingsBED is the most common eating disorder among Black women. Moreover, evidence supports alternative factors that contribute to the onset of BED in Black women, including stress, trauma, and food insecurity. Furthermore, though there are evidence-based treatments for BED, disparities persist in access to care and treatment retention. Recommendations for increasing the cultural relevance of assessments and treatments are provided. Gaps in the literature remain on the use of evidence-based treatments for BED among Black women. As such, healthcare providers should include Black women as co-collaborators in their care and seek out training and consultation to aid in providing culturally affirming treatment.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderFeeding and Eating DisordersBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansWhite PeopleBinge eatingBinge-eating disorderBlack AmericanEating disordersEating disorder treatment

Identifiers

PMID36370263
PMCPMC9789195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.