ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2023
Duplication Versus Deletion Through the Lens of 15q13.3: Clinical and Research Implications of Studying Copy Number Variants Associated with Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neurons.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity of molecular karyotypes of 234 pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder in chromosomal microarray analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of 15q13.3 deletion and duplication syndrome: what do we tell the prospective parents?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- A Paradigmatic Case of Genetic Overlap Between Neurodevelopment Disorders and Schizophrenia Aligning with the Neurodevelopmental Continuum Hypothesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genetic Alterations in a Large Population of Italian Patients Affected by Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Genes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs), involving duplication or deletion of susceptible intervals of the human genome, underlie a range of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. As accessible in vivo animal models of these disorders often cannot be generated, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models derived from patients carrying these CNVs can reveal alterations of brain development and neuronal function that contribute to these disorders. CNVs involving deletion versus duplication of a particular genomic interval often result both in distinct clinical phenotypes and in differential phenotypic penetrance. This review initially focuses on CNVs at 15q13.3, which contribute to autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and schizophrenia. Like most CNVs, deletions at 15q13.3 usually cause severe clinical phenotypes, while duplications instead result in highly variable penetrance, with some carriers exhibiting no clinical phenotype. Here, we describe cellular and molecular phenotypes seen in iPSC-derived neuronal models of 15q13.3 duplication and deletion, which may contribute both to the differential clinical consequences and phenotypic penetrance. We then relate this work to many other CNVs involving both duplication and deletion, summarizing findings from iPSC studies and their relationship to clinical phenotype. Together, this work highlights how CNVs involving duplication versus deletion can differentially alter neural development and function to contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders. iPSC-derived neuronal models of these disorders can be used both to understand the underlying neurodevelopmental alterations and to develop pharmacological or molecular approaches for phenotypic rescue that may suggest leads for patient intervention. Top: Deletion versus duplication of the same genomic interval results in different clinical phenotypes and degrees of phenotypic penetrance. Example findings schematized. Bottom: iPSC-derived neurons from individuals with these CNVs involving deletion versus duplication likewise often differential phenotypes (increases or decreases) in the categories shown. Figure created with BioRender.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.