Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36370254›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2023

COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes and Intentions Among U.S. Soldiers: Results from the U.S. Army Behavioral Health Advisory Team (BHAT).

Matthew R Beymer, Stephanie A Q Gomez, Theresa Jackson Santo, Amy Millikan Bell, Phillip J Quartana

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis of Non-Compulsory Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccination among Polish Soldiers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew R BeymerU.S. Army Public Health Center, U.S. Army Medical Command, 21010, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA. usarmy.apg.medcom-aphc.list.eds-bshop-ops@mail.mil.ORCID 0000-0001-5258-1095
Stephanie A Q GomezU.S. Army Public Health Center, U.S. Army Medical Command, 21010, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Theresa Jackson SantoU.S. Army Public Health Center, U.S. Army Medical Command, 21010, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Amy Millikan BellU.S. Army Public Health Center, U.S. Army Medical Command, 21010, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Phillip J QuartanaWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 20910, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
United States Army Medical Command · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this study is to characterize the associations between demographic, attitudinal, and leadership factors with COVID-19 vaccination rates, vaccination intentions among those not vaccinated, and attitudes about vaccination safety, effectiveness, and importance.

methodsA serial cross-sectional anonymous online survey was administered to soldiers at two large U.S. Army Divisions located in the Southwestern region of the U.S. at two different time points (April-May 2021 [Time 1; T1] N = 24,629; July-August 2021 [Time 2; T2] N = 21,116). Binary logistic regressions were used to assess demographic and attitudinal predictors of vaccination receipt and vaccination intent. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to assess demographic and leadership predictors of endorsement of three vaccination attitudes concerning effectiveness, safety, and importance.

resultsApproximately 43% of soldiers reported that they received a COVID-19 vaccine at T1, increasing to 67% at T2. Soldiers who agreed with three separate statements on vaccination effectiveness, safety, or importance were more likely to indicate that they intended to get the vaccination at both time points. Soldiers who reported that their immediate supervisor encouraged soldiers to get a COVID-19 vaccine were more likely to indicate that the vaccination was effective, safe, or important at both time points. DISCUSSION: Negative attitudes about COVID-19 vaccines were prevalent and correlated with less intention to get a vaccination. However, prioritizing leadership engagement around the importance of vaccinations may be a simple but widely effective intervention point to increase future vaccine uptake following the development of novel vaccines to future COVID-19 variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19Military PersonnelCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntentionSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesLeadershipVaccination AttitudesVaccination IntentionsVaccination Uptake

Identifiers

PMID36370254
PMCPMC9652595
OpenAlexW4309081614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.