Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36370173›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Assessment of cumulative cancer risk attributable to diagnostic X-ray radiation: a large cohort study.

Yanjun Hu, Moxuan Ma, Hongxia Yin, Pengling Ren, Xin Tian, Zhimin Zheng, Zhaohui Zhong, Zhenchang Wang, Zhenghan Yang, Hui Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanjun HuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, Youanmen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China.
Moxuan MaSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, Youanmen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-5569
Hongxia YinDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Pengling RenDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Xin TianDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhimin ZhengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, Youanmen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China.
Zhaohui ZhongDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhenchang WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhenghan YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China. yangzhenghan@vip.163.com.
Hui ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, Youanmen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, People's Republic of China. chenhui@ccmu.edu.cn.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81971707Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality No. 7212199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the risk of cancer induced by diagnostic X-ray exposure in multiple radiological examinations and to explore the relevant influences to provide a reference for rational usage of X-ray examinations.

methodsData for all adult patients who underwent X-ray examinations from August 2004 to April 2020 in a general hospital was collected, including sex, age, primary diagnosis, and X-ray examination. Based on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations report, age and sex and effective dose for a single X-ray examination were used to calculate the lifetime attributable risk (LAR). Patients whose cancer LAR values were in the top 5% were considered to have a high cancer risk; the factors influencing this status were explored by using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

resultsIn total, 1,143,413 patients with 3,301,286 X-ray examinations were included. LARs of cancer incidence and death were < 0.2% and < 0.13% among 95% of patients and they were > 1% among 0.21% and 0.07% of patients. High risks of incidence and death were significantly associated with corrected exposure frequency (odds ratio [OR], 1.080 and 1.080), sex (OR, male vs. female, 0.421 and 0.372), and year of birth (OR, 1.088 and 1.054), with all p values < 0.001. Among 20 disease categories, congenital disease (OR, 3.792 and 4.024), genitourinary disease (OR, 3.608 and 3.202), digestive disease (OR, 3.247 and 3.272), and tumor disease (OR, 2.706 and 2.767) had the strongest associations with high risks of incidence and death (all p values < 0.001).

conclusionsCancer risk induced by diagnostic X-ray examinations can be considered acceptable clinically. Patients having certain diseases are potentially at a relative higher risk due to recurrent examinations. KEY POINTS: • It was the first large-scale investigation of cumulative X-ray exposure in China, involving more than 3.3 million X-ray scans of all types of diagnostic X-ray examinations for about 1.1 million patients during the past 16 years. • The study revealed that the incidence risk of cancer induced by X-ray-related examinations was 0.01% on average, which was substantially lower than that of cancer induced by non-X-ray radiation. The risk could be considered acceptable clinically. • Patients having certain diseases were potentially at a relatively higher cancer risk due to recurrent X-ray examinations. The cumulative effect of X-ray exposure could not be ignored and was worthy of attention.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Radiation-InducedAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRadiation DosageRadiographyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCancerDoseLifetime attributable riskPrimary diagnosisX-ray-related examination

Identifiers

PMID36370173
OpenAlexW4308834651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.