Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36370119›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2023

Opportunities to advance implementation science and nutrition research: a commentary on the Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research.

Holly L Nicastro, Susan Vorkoper, Rene Sterling, Ariella R Korn, Alison G M Brown, Padma Maruvada, April Y Oh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Food Rx: Integrating horticulture research to improve nutrition and health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Detecting Eating Episodes From Wrist Motion Using Daily Pattern Analysis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Holly L NicastroOffice of Nutrition Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-8113
Susan VorkoperDivision of International Science Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Fogarty International Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rene SterlingDivision of Genomics and Society, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ariella R KornCancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Rockville, MD, USA.
Alison G M BrownDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8497-1343
Padma MaruvadaDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA.
April Y OhImplementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USFogarty International Center · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite population-wide recommendations by the U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans and others to encourage health-promoting dietary patterns, the proportion of Americans following dietary recommendations remains low. The gaps in the adoption and integration of evidence-based dietary interventions, practices, programs, and policies (EBIs) into community and clinical settings signal the need to strengthen efforts in implementation science (IS) in nutrition research to understand and alleviate barriers to adopting and sustaining healthy dietary behaviors and practices. Equally important is the translation of this research into practice in a variety of settings and across the diversity of populations. Recognizing this need, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2020-2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research calls for the expansion of IS as a key opportunity to advancing nutrition research. This commentary highlights three scientific opportunities to stimulate IS in nutrition research and provides examples for each opportunity. These include: (a) Advance consideration of implementation and dissemination early in the design of interventions to facilitate opportunities for equitable scale-up and sustainability of EBIs, (b) Develop and test strategies for equitable implementation of nutrition and diet EBIs in health care and community settings, and (c) Build and strengthen the infrastructure, capacity, and expertise needed to increase use of IS in clinical and community nutrition research to swiftly move the research into practice. By advancing the three opportunities identified in this commentary, the scientific community has the potential to advance the field of nutrition research and IS with the ultimate goal of improving public health.

Indexed as

DietImplementation ScienceHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Public HealthResearchUnited StatesDietEvidence-based interventionsImplementation scienceNutrition

Identifiers

PMID36370119
PMCPMC10091491
OpenAlexW4308826689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.