Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369985›Full record

ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2022

The Dignity Project Framework: An extreme citizen science framework in occupational therapy and rehabilitation research.

Kelsey Chapman, Angel Dixon, Kevin Cocks, Carolyn Ehrlich, Elizabeth Kendall

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelsey ChapmanHopkins Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5668-661X
Angel DixonGriffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Kevin CocksHopkins Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Carolyn EhrlichHopkins Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Elizabeth KendallGriffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Griffith University · AU

Funding

Motor Accident Insurance CommissionOffice of the Queensland Chief Scientist
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEngaging citizens and patients as research partners is receiving increasing emphasis across disciplines, because citizens are untapped resources for solving complex problems. Occupational therapists are engaging in inclusive research, but not always in equitable partnership. Moving beyond inclusive research to a dignified framework for research prioritises lived experience and human rights in health research.

methodsUsing nominal group technique over a series of three working group meetings, eight experts, including three with lived experience of disability and research, prioritised principles and steps for conducting dignified rehabilitation research in partnership with citizens with disability.

findingsEmbedding transparency, accessibility and inclusion, dignified language, and authenticity throughout research were integral to maintaining dignity and safety for citizens with disability engaged in research. The Dignity Project Framework encompasses five phases, namely, (1) vision, (2) uncover, (3) discuss, (4) critical reflection, and (5) change, which address the prominent criticisms of the disability community about research and embed the principles of importance into research practice.

conclusionThe framework builds on inclusive research frameworks to a human rights-based, dignified framework for extreme citizen science. Grounding disability in contemporary conceptualisations and providing a method for democratising knowledge production provide occupational therapists with a method for dignified partnership with citizens with disability.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceOccupational TherapyPersons with DisabilitiesHumansRehabilitation ResearchRespectcitizen scienceconsumer engagementco-researchers with disabilitydignified researchdignitydisability studiesinclusive research

Identifiers

PMID36369985
PMCPMC10100520
OpenAlexW4308834718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.