Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369901›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2023

Pembrolizumab in Asian patients with microsatellite-instability-high/mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

Takayuki Yoshino, Thierry Andre, Tae Won Kim, Wei Peng Yong, Kai-Keen Shiu, Benny Vittrup Jensen, Lars Henrik Jensen, Cornelis J A Punt, Denis Smith, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02563002 (A Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02563002 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) vs. Chemotherapy in Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) or Mismatch Repair Deficient (dMMR) Stage IV Colorectal Carcinoma (KEYNOTE-177)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2015 to 2023Enrolled307ConditionsColorectal CarcinomaArmsmFOLFOX6, FOLFIRI, Pembrolizumab, Bevacizumab, Cetuximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expert consensus on the optimal management of BRAFAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Takayuki YoshinoNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-4756
Thierry AndreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sorbonne University, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM 938, SIRIC CURAMUS, Paris, France.
Tae Won KimAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea.
Wei Peng YongNational University Hospital, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Kai-Keen ShiuUniversity College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Benny Vittrup JensenHerlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Lars Henrik JensenUniversity Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Cornelis J A PuntAmsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Denis SmithHôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Rocio Garcia-CarboneroHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Imas12, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Julia Alcaide-GarciaUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Médica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Malaga, Spain.
Peter GibbsWestern Hospital, Footscray, Victoria, Australia.
Christelle de la FouchardiereCentre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Fernando RiveraFernando Rivera, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Elena ElezVall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Dung T LeThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Noriaki AdachiMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
David FogelmanMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Patricia MarinelloMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Luis A DiazDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USAsan Medical Center · KRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRFootscray Hospital · AUHerlev Hospital · DKHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria · ESInserm · FRJohns Hopkins University · USMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phase 3 KEYNOTE-177 study evaluated pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab in patients with newly diagnosed, microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety. Here, we report results from the post hoc analysis of patients who were enrolled in Asia from the final analysis (FA) of KEYNOTE-177. A total of 48 patients from Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan (pembrolizumab, n = 22; chemotherapy, n = 26) were included. At FA, median time from randomization to data cutoff (February 19, 2021) was 45.3 (range 38.1-57.8) months with pembrolizumab and 43.9 (range 36.6-55.1) months with chemotherapy. Median PFS was not reached (NR; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 months-NR) with pembrolizumab versus 10.4 (95% CI 6.3-22.0) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.20). Median OS was NR (range 13.8 months-NR) versus 30.0 (14.7-NR) months (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.55) and ORR was 50% (95% CI 28-72) versus 46% (95% CI 27-67). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by two patients (9%) in the pembrolizumab arm and 20 (80%) in the chemotherapy arm. Immune-mediated adverse events or infusion reactions were reported by six patients (27%) and 10 patients (40%), respectively. No deaths due to TRAEs occurred. These data support first-line pembrolizumab as a standard of care for patients from Asia with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02563002.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedpembrolizumabAsiacolorectal cancermicrosatellite instabilitymismatch-repair deficiencypembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID36369901
PMCPMC9986093
OpenAlexW4308834363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.