Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369797›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2023

Evaluation of levocetirizine in beagle dog and cynomolgus monkey telemetry assays: Defining the no QTc effect profile by timepoint and concentration-QTc analysis.

Michael J Engwall, Joel Baublits, Fiona A Chandra, Zack W Jones, Jan Wahlstrom, Ray W Chui, Hugo M Vargas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J EngwallTranslational Safety & Bioanalytical Sciences, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Joel BaublitsTranslational Safety & Bioanalytical Sciences, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Fiona A ChandraAmgen Clinical Pharmacology Modeling & Simulation, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Zack W JonesAmgen Clinical Pharmacology Modeling & Simulation, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Jan WahlstromPharmacokinetics, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Ray W ChuiTranslational Safety & Bioanalytical Sciences, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1162-8680
Hugo M VargasTranslational Safety & Bioanalytical Sciences, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9447-3164
Amgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In prior clinical studies, levocetirizine (LEVO) has demonstrated no effect on ventricular repolarization (QTc intervals), therefore it is a relevant negative control to assess in nonclinical assays to define low proarrhythmic risk. LEVO was tested in beagle dog and cynomolgus monkey (nonhuman primate [NHP]) telemetry models to understand the nonclinical-clinical translation of this negative control. One oral dose of vehicle, LEVO (10 mg/kg/species) or moxifloxacin (MOXI; 30 mg/kg/dog; 80 mg/kg/NHP) was administered to instrumented animals (N = 8/species) using a cross-over dosing design; MOXI was the in-study positive control. Corrected QT interval values (QTcI) were calculated using an individual animal correction factor. Blood samples were taken for drug exposure during telemetry and for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis (same animals; different day) for exposure-response (C-QTc) modeling. Statistical analysis of QTc-by-timepoint data showed that LEVO treatment was consistent with vehicle, thus no effect on ventricular repolarization was observed over 24 h in both species. PK analysis indicated that LEVO-maximum concentration levels in dogs (range: 12,300-20,100 ng/ml) and NHPs (range: 4090-12,700 ng/ml) were ≥4-fold higher than supratherapeutic drug levels in clinical QTc studies. Slope analysis values in dogs (0.00019 ms/ng/ml) and NHPs (0.00016 ms/ng/ml) were similar to the human C-QTc relationship and indicated no relationship between QTc intervals and plasma levels of LEVO. MOXI treatment caused QTc interval prolongation (dog: 18 ms; NHP: 29 ms). The characterization of LEVO in these non-rodent telemetry studies further demonstrates the value and impact of the in vivo QTc assay to define a "no QTc effect" profile and support clinical safety assessment.

Indexed as

FluoroquinolonesLong QT SyndromeAnimalsCetirizineDogsHumansMacaca fascicularisMoxifloxacinTelemetryCetirizineFluoroquinoloneslevocetirizineMoxifloxacin

Identifiers

PMID36369797
PMCPMC10014691
OpenAlexW4308834900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.