ArticleNPJ precision oncology2022
Landscape of potentially targetable receptor tyrosine kinase fusions in diverse cancers by DNA-based profiling.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Hydrogel in the Capture and Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Understanding the Promise and Challenges of Tumor-Agnostic Therapy: Could One Size Really Fit All?Cancers · 2026Review
- Optogenetic Translocation to Subcellular Compartments through Regulation of Protein Avidity.ACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitors in late-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer following targeted therapy resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Low-order assemblies drive oncogenic RTK fusion signaling without condensation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Oncofusions - shaping cancer care.The oncologist · 2025Article
- RNA hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing has high sensitivity in identifying known and less characterized oncogenic and likely oncogenicFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Oncogenic EML4-ALK assemblies suppress growth factor perception and modulate drug tolerance.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Fusion Challenges in Solid Tumors: Shaping the Landscape of Cancer Care in Precision Medicine.JCO precision oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- A narrative review of methods for the identification ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2023Review
- Decoding Oncofusions: Unveiling Mechanisms, Clinical Impact, and Prospects for Personalized Cancer Therapies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Targeting Receptor Tyrosine Kinases as a Novel Strategy for the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent fusions of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are often driving events in tumorigenesis that carry important diagnostic value and are potentially targetable by the increasing number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Here, we characterized the spectrum of 1324 RTK fusions with intact kinase domains in solid tumors by DNA-based high-throughput sequencing. Overall, the prevalence of RTK fusions were 4.7%, with variable frequencies and diverse genomic structures and fusion partners across cancer types. Cancer types, such as thyroid cancers, urological cancers and neuroendocrine tumors are selective in the RTK fusions they carry, while others exhibit highly complex spectra of fusion events. Notably, most RTKs were promiscuous in terms of the partner genes they recombine with. A large proportion of RTK fusions had one of the breakpoints localized to intergenic regions. Comprehensive genomic profiling revealed differences in co-mutational patterns pre- and post-TKI treatments across various RTK fusions. At baseline, multiple cases were detected with co-occurring RTK fusions or concomitant oncogenic mutations in driver genes, such as KRAS and EGFR. Following TKI resistance, we observed differences in potential on- and off-target resistance mutations among fusion variants. For example, the EML4-ALK v3 variant displayed more complex on-target resistance mechanisms, which might explain the reduced survival outcome compared with the v1 variant. Finally, we identified two lung cancer patients with MET+ and NTRK1+ tumors, respectively, who responded well to crizotinib treatment. Taken together, our findings demonstrate the diagnostic and prognostic values of screening for RTK fusions using DNA-based sequencing in solid tumors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.