Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369462›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

An impairment-specific hip exoskeleton assistance for gait training in subjects with acquired brain injury: a feasibility study.

Chiara Livolsi, Roberto Conti, Eleonora Guanziroli, Þór Friðriksson, Ásgeir Alexandersson, Kristleifur Kristjánsson, Alberto Esquenazi, Raffaele Molino Lova, Duane Romo, Francesco Giovacchini and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Online Adaptation Framework Enables Personalization of Exoskeleton Assistance During Locomotion in Patients Affected by Stroke.IEEE transactions on robotics : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chiara LivolsiThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy. chiara.livolsi@santannapisa.it.
Roberto ContiIUVO S.R.L., Pontedera, Pisa, Italy.
Eleonora GuanziroliVilla Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Costa Masnaga, Lecco, Italy.
Þór FriðrikssonÖssur, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ásgeir AlexanderssonÖssur, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Kristleifur KristjánssonÖssur, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Alberto EsquenaziDepartment of PM&R, MossRehab and Einstein Healthcare Network, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Raffaele Molino LovaIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Florence, Italy.
Duane RomoÖssur, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Francesco GiovacchiniIUVO S.R.L., Pontedera, Pisa, Italy.
Simona CreaThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy.
Franco MolteniVilla Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Costa Masnaga, Lecco, Italy.
Nicola VitielloThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy.
Össur (Iceland) · ISInternational Flame Research Foundation · ITOspedale Valduce · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITMoss Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the feasibility and the potential effects on walking performance of a short gait training with a novel impairment-specific hip assistance (iHA) through a bilateral active pelvis orthosis (APO) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Fourteen subjects capable of independent gait and exhibiting mild-to-moderate gait deficits, due to an ABI, were enrolled. Subjects presenting deficit in hip flexion and/or extension were included and divided into two groups based on the presence (group A, n = 6) or absence (group B, n = 8) of knee hyperextension during stance phase of walking. Two iHA-based profiles were developed for the groups. The protocol included two overground gait training sessions using APO, and two evaluation sessions, pre and post training. Primary outcomes were pre vs. post-training walking distance and steady-state speed in the 6-min walking test. Secondary outcomes were self-selected speed, joint kinematics and kinetics, gait symmetry and forward propulsion, assessed through 3D gait analysis. Following the training, study participants significantly increased the walked distance and average steady-state speed in the 6-min walking tests, both when walking with and without the APO. The increased walked distance surpassed the minimal clinically important difference for groups A and B, (respectively, 42 and 57 m > 34 m). In group A, five out of six subjects had decreased knee hyperextension at the post-training session (on average the peak of the knee extension angle was reduced by 36%). Knee flexion during swing phase increased, by 16% and 31%, for A and B groups respectively. Two-day gait training with APO providing iHA was effective and safe in improving walking performance and knee kinematics in ABI survivors. These preliminary findings suggest that this strategy may be viable for subject-specific post-ABI gait rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesExoskeleton DeviceBiomechanical PhenomenaFeasibility StudiesGaitHumansWalking

Identifiers

PMID36369462
PMCPMC9652374
OpenAlexW4309046859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.