ArticleScientific reports2022
Novel deep learning hybrid models (CNN-GRU and DLDL-RF) for the susceptibility classification of dust sources in the Middle East: a global source.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional Ground-Based IoT Solar Irradiance Monitoring: A Multi-Site Study Across Mountain, Rural, and Urban Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- An assessment of global land susceptibility to wind erosion based on deep-active learning modelling and interpretation techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Preliminary data on artificial intelligence tool in magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative pathologies of lumbar spine.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- An interpretable deep learning model to map land subsidence hazard.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Windblown sand hazards risk assessment along the highways based on GIS-game theory combination weight.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dust storms have many negative consequences, and affect all kinds of ecosystems, as well as climate and weather conditions. Therefore, classification of dust storm sources into different susceptibility categories can help us mitigate its negative effects. This study aimed to classify the susceptibility of dust sources in the Middle East (ME) by developing two novel deep learning (DL) hybrid models based on the convolutional neural network-gated recurrent unit (CNN-GRU) model, and the dense layer deep learning-random forest (DLDL-RF) model. The Dragonfly algorithm (DA) was used to identify the critical features controlling dust sources. Game theory was used for the interpretability of the DL model's output. Predictive DL models were constructed by dividing datasets randomly into train (70%) and test (30%) groups, six statistical indicators being then applied to assess the DL hybrid model performance for both datasets (train and test). Among 13 potential features (or variables) controlling dust sources, seven variables were selected as important and six as non-important by DA, respectively. Based on the DLDL-RF hybrid model - a model with higher accuracy in comparison with CNN-GRU-23.1, 22.8, and 22.2% of the study area were classified as being of very low, low and moderate susceptibility, whereas 20.2 and 11.7% of the area were classified as representing high and very high susceptibility classes, respectively. Among seven important features selected by DA, clay content, silt content, and precipitation were identified as the three most important by game theory through permutation values. Overall, DL hybrid models were found to be efficient methods for prediction purposes on large spatial scales with no or incomplete datasets from ground-based measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.