Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369252›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2022

Characterizing the effect of demographics, cardiorespiratory factors, and inter-subject variation on maternal heart rate variability in pregnancy with statistical modeling: a retrospective observational analysis.

M Bester, R Joshi, A Linders, M Mischi, J O E H van Laar, R Vullings

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M BesterDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. m.bester@tue.nl.
R JoshiPatient Care and Monitoring, Philips Research, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
A LindersFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M MischiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J O E H van LaarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
R VullingsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Eindhoven University of Technology · NLMaastricht University · NLNXP (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy complications are associated with insufficient adaptation of the maternal autonomic nervous system to the physiological demands of pregnancy. Consequently, assessing maternal heart rate variability (mHRV)-which reflects autonomic regulation-is a promising tool for detecting early deterioration in maternal health. However, before mHRV can be used to screen for complications, an understanding of the factors influencing mHRV during healthy pregnancy is needed. In this retrospective observational study, we develop regression models to unravel the effects of maternal demographics (age, body mass index (BMI), gestational age (GA), and parity), cardiorespiratory factors (heart rate and breathing rate), and inter-subject variation on mHRV. We develop these models using two datasets which are comprised of, respectively, single measurements in 290 healthy pregnant women and repeated measurements (median = 8) in 29 women with healthy pregnancies. Our most consequential finding is that between one-third and two-thirds of the variation in mHRV can be attributed to inter-subject variability. Additionally, median heart rate dominantly affects mHRV (p < 0.001), while BMI and parity have no effect. Moreover, we found that median breathing rate, age, and GA all impact mHRV (p < 0.05). These results suggest that personalized, long-term monitoring would be necessary for using mHRV for obstetric screening.

Indexed as

Heart RateDemographyFemaleGestational AgeHumansParityPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36369252
PMCPMC9651120
OpenAlexW4308920659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.