ArticleScientific reports2022
Self-charging of sprays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional printing of ice structures via evaporative cooling in vacuum.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Intelligent Perception, Decision-Making and Actuation Technologies for Precision Agrochemical Spraying: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Giant mobility of surface-trapped ionic charges following liquid tribocharging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Combining electroless ionisation mass spectrometry with solid-phase extraction for the direct analysis of beta-agonists in bovine urine.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Electroless Ionization Mass Spectrometry Using a Compact Electrokinetic Ionization Source.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The charging of poorly conducting liquids due to flows is a well-known phenomenon, yet the precise charging mechanism is not fully understood. This is especially relevant for sprays, where the spray plume dynamics and maximum distance travelled of a spray dramatically changes for different levels of charging: charging of the droplets makes them repel, thereby preventing drop coalescence and altering the shape of the spray plume. As the charging depends on many factors including the flow and the interactions between the liquid and the nozzle, many models and scaling laws exist in the literature. In this work we focus on perhaps the simplest flow regime, laminar jets created by ultra short channels, and quantify the charging as a function of the different parameters. We present a simple model that collapses all the data for over 4 orders of magnitude difference in streaming currents for various nozzle sizes, flow velocities and surface treatments. We further show that the charging polarity can even be reversed by applying an oppositely charged coating to the nozzle, an important step for any application.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.