Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369156›Full record

ReviewRespiratory research2022

A review of the challenges, learnings and future directions of home handheld spirometry in interstitial lung disease.

Toby M Maher, Courtney Schiffman, Michael Kreuter, Catharina C Moor, Steven D Nathan, Judit Axmann, Paula Belloni, Monica Bengus, Frank Gilberg, Klaus-Uwe Kirchgaessler and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03099187 phase2completednot on this map

Multicenter, International, Double-blind, Two-Arm, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase II Trial of Pirfenidone in Patients With Unclassifiable Progressive Fibrosing ILD

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2017 to 2020Enrolled253ConditionsLung Diseases, InterstitialArmsPirfenidone, Placebo
NCT03261037 nacompletednot on this map

An International Study to Characterize the Disease Behaviour of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Interstitial Lung Disease During the Peri-Diagnostic Period

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2017 to 2019Enrolled178ConditionsIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Interstitial Lung DiseaseArmsSpirometry, Accelerometry, 6MWT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Digital health delivery in respiratory medicine: adjunct, replacement or cause for division?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Toby M MaherNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. Toby.Maher@med.usc.edu.
Courtney SchiffmanGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael KreuterCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pulmonology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Catharina C MoorCenter for Interstitial Lung Diseases and Sarcoidosis, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven D NathanThe Advanced Lung Disease and Transplant Program, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Judit AxmannF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Paula BelloniGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Monica BengusF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Frank GilbergF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Klaus-Uwe KirchgaesslerF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Marlies S WijsenbeekCenter for Interstitial Lung Diseases and Sarcoidosis, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHErasmus MC · NLGerman Center for Lung Research · DEImperial College London · GBInova Fairfax Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) require regular physician visits and referral to specialist ILD clinics. Difficulties or delays in accessing care can limit opportunities to monitor disease trajectory and response to treatment, and the COVID-19 pandemic has added to these challenges. Therefore, home monitoring technologies, such as home handheld spirometry, have gained increased attention as they may help to improve access to care for patients with ILD. However, while several studies have shown that home handheld spirometry in ILD is acceptable for most patients, data from clinical trials are not sufficiently robust to support its use as a primary endpoint. This review discusses the challenges that were encountered with handheld spirometry across three recent ILD studies, which included home spirometry as a primary endpoint, and highlights where further optimisation and research into home handheld spirometry in ILD is required. Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) as measured by daily home handheld spirometry versus site spirometry was of primary interest in three recently completed studies: STARLINER (NCT03261037), STARMAP and a Phase II study of pirfenidone in progressive fibrosing unclassifiable ILD (NCT03099187). Unanticipated practical and technical issues led to problems with estimating FVC decline. In all three studies, cross-sectional correlations for home handheld versus site spirometry were strong/moderate at baseline and later timepoints, but longitudinal correlations were weak. Other issues observed with the home handheld spirometry data included: high within-patient variability in home handheld FVC measurements; implausible longitudinal patterns in the home handheld spirometry data that were not reflected in site spirometry; and extreme estimated rates of FVC change.

conclusionsHome handheld spirometry in ILD requires further optimisation and research to ensure accurate and reliable FVC measurements before it can be used as an endpoint in clinical trials. Refresher training, automated alerts of problems and FVC changes, and patient support could help to overcome some practical issues. Despite the challenges, there is value in incorporating home handheld spirometry into clinical practice, and the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the potential for home monitoring technologies to help improve access to care for patients with ILD.

Indexed as

COVID-19Lung Diseases, InterstitialClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionHumansPandemicsSpirometryVital CapacityAnalytical challengesHome handheld spirometryIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisInterstitial lung diseasePractical challengesRemote monitoringTechnical challenges

Identifiers

PMID36369156
PMCPMC9651119
OpenAlexW4309181403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.