ArticleKnee surgery & related research2022
Intramedullary rod insertion places the femoral component more laterally during Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Article in Knee surgery & related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to assess the influence of intramedullary rods on the implantation positions of femoral components using Microplasty instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that femoral components can be laterally implanted incorrectly when using intramedullary rods.
methodsThis prospective study included all 45 consecutive patients (53 knees) who underwent Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery for anteromedial osteoarthritis or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee at our hospital during the study period. A custom-made toolset comprising a triangular caliper and circular trial bearings was used to evaluate the distance between the bearing and the vertical wall of the tibia implant (wall-bearing space) using the caliper at 90° flexion both with and without intramedullary rods.
resultsThe wall-bearing space was significantly larger when the intramedullary rod was used than when intramedullary rod was not used (1.8 ± 1.1 mm versus 3.4 ± 1.2 mm, P < 0.001). The mean difference of wall-bearing space with and without intramedullary rod was 1.6 ± 0.7 mm.
conclusionsFemoral components can be laterally implanted incorrectly by an average of 1.6 mm when using intramedullary rods. The wall-bearing space should be evaluated using trial components, and if the relationship is improper, it should be corrected before keel slot preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.