Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369083›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2022

What is an appropriate gestational weight gain for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: based on the adverse pregnancy outcomes of over 12 thousand participants?

Xiaoqin Luo, Jiayi Gao, Zhangya He, Jing Ji, Wanyu Zhang, Pei Wu, Xiaoxiao Guo, Dan Cao, Zhangrui Xu, Chao Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoqin Luo *Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Jiayi Gao *Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Zhangya HeDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Jing JiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwest Women and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Wanyu ZhangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Pei WuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Xiaoxiao GuoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Dan CaoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Zhangrui XuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Yang MiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwest Women and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, 710061, China. miyangmm@163.com.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNNorthwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Special Project of the Development Center for Medical Science & Technology of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China W2015CAE060National Natural Science Foundation of China 81874263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence showed possible benefits of a less gestational weight gain (GWG) than the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendation in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pregnancy. Here, we aimed to explore an appropriate GWG range in GDM women according to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

methodsWe enrolled all the singleton GDM pregnant women (n = 14,213) from January 2015 to December 2018 in Xi'an, Northwest China. According to the pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), they were classified into the Underweight (< 18.5 kg/m

resultsTotally, 12,712 participants were finally recruited. There were 1180 (9.3%), 9134 (71.9%), 2097 (16.5%), and 301 (2.4%) patients in the Underweight, Normal weight, Overweight, and Obesity groups, respectively. Adverse outcomes increased with the elevation of pre-pregnancy BMI. Among them, the risk of cesarean section was the highest, followed by large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA), preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension. Through the analysis of the risk of adverse outcomes in continuous GWG categories in each group, an ideal GWG range obtained in this study was as follows: 10-15.9 kg, 8-11.9 kg, 6-7.9 kg, and -5-3.9 kg for the Underweight, Normal weight, Overweight and Obesity group, respectively. Furthermore, the ranges in this study were more protective for adverse outcomes than those from IOM.

conclusionsBased on the adverse pregnancy outcomes of over 12 thousand participants, our findings showed a more stringent GWG range for GDM women than the IOM criteria recommendation.

Indexed as

Gestational diabetes mellitusGestational weight gainPregnancyPregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36369083
PMCPMC9652847
OpenAlexW4308792148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.