Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36369021›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Health promotion and disease prevention in the education of health professionals: a mapping of European educational programmes from 2019.

Kristiina Patja, Tessa Huis In 't Veld, Dorottya Arva, Marjorie Bonello, Rana Orhan Pees, Marc Soethout, Martin van der Esch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristiina PatjaDepartment of Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, PO BOX 20 (Tukholmankatu 8 B), 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Tessa Huis In 't VeldEcorys Nederland BV, Watermanweg 44, 3067 GG, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dorottya ArvaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, 1089, Budapest, Hungary. arva.dorottya@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.
Marjorie BonelloDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2090, Malta.
Rana Orhan PeesEuropean Medical Students' Association (EMSA), c/o CPME, Rue Guimard 15, 1040, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc SoethoutDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin van der EschCentre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Weesperzijde 190, 1097 DZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth professionals face barriers in carrying out effective health promotion and disease prevention. To indicate what are the needs for curriculum development in educational programmes, this study aims to provide an overview of how various health professionals are currently trained in health promotion and disease prevention at different educational levels.

methodsIn 2019, a descriptive mapping exercise was performed focusing on European programmes for different health and healthcare professionals at the three levels of education (undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuous professional development [CPD]). Data were collected by a self-developed online survey that was distributed using a modified snowball method.

resultsA total of 186 educational programmes of 17 different health professionals were analysed, implemented in 31 countries (60% were undergraduate, 30% postgraduate and 10% CPD programmes). Nearly all programmes indicated that expected outcomes were defined on knowledge (99%), skills (94%) and behaviours/attitudes (89%) regarding health promotion and disease prevention. A multidisciplinary approach was reported to be applied by 81% of the programmes. Traditional teaching methods such as lectures (97%) and assignments (81%) were dominant, while e-learning was less frequently used (46%). Digitalization in health promotion and digital health coaching were the least addressed topics in most programmes.

conclusionsHealth promotion and disease prevention are reported at all surveyed levels of education for a broad spectrum of health professionals. Educational programmes cover contents on knowledge, skills, and behaviours. There is a need for capacity building and joint development in health promotion education. Specifically, there is a need to include digitalisation and novel teaching in the educational programmes of health promotion and disease prevention.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth PromotionCurriculumDelivery of Health CareHumansLearningStudentsDisease preventionEducationHealth professionalsHealth promotionNon-communicable diseasesTeaching methods

Identifiers

PMID36369021
PMCPMC9652036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.