ArticleBMC medical imaging2022
A deep learning approach for automated diagnosis of pulmonary embolism on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of AI-Based Algorithms in Pulmonary Embolism Detection on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- AI-Based Pulmonary Embolism Detection: The Added Value of a False-Positive Reduction Module over a Region Proposal Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing Pulmonary Embolism Detection with Integrated Deep Learning Architectures.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for mortality risk in elderly patients with pulmonary embolism using machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Embolism Detection in Unenhanced CT Exams: A Radiomic-Based Classifier as a Promising Screening-Diagnostic Tool.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Disease Classification of Pulmonary Xenon Ventilation MRI Using Artificial Intelligence.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- An optimized domain-specific shrimp detection architecture integrating conditional GAN and weighted ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based algorithm for automatic detection of incidental pulmonary embolism on contrast-enhanced CT: a multicenter multivendor study.Radiology advances · 2025Article
- Advancements in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Radiological Detection of Pulmonary Embolism.Cureus · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of early pulmonary embolism after thoracic surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Machine learning in cancer-associated thrombosis: hype or hope in untangling the clot.Bleeding, thrombosis and vascular biology · 2024Article
- Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Automatic Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in Chest CT Angiograms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the diagnostic standard for confirming pulmonary embolism (PE). Since PE is a life-threatening condition, early diagnosis and treatment are critical to avoid PE-associated morbidity and mortality. However, PE remains subject to misdiagnosis.
methodsWe retrospectively identified 251 CTPAs performed at a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 to January 2021. The scans were classified as positive (n = 55) and negative (n = 196) for PE based on the annotations made by board-certified radiologists. A fully anonymized CT slice served as input for the detection of PE by the 2D segmentation model comprising U-Net architecture with Xception encoder. The diagnostic performance of the model was calculated at both the scan and the slice levels.
resultsThe model correctly identified 44 out of 55 scans as positive for PE and 146 out of 196 scans as negative for PE with a sensitivity of 0.80 [95% CI 0.68, 0.89], a specificity of 0.74 [95% CI 0.68, 0.80], and an accuracy of 0.76 [95% CI 0.70, 0.81]. On slice level, 4817 out of 5183 slices were marked as positive for the presence of emboli with a specificity of 0.89 [95% CI 0.88, 0.89], a sensitivity of 0.93 [95% CI 0.92, 0.94], and an accuracy of 0.89 [95% CI 0.887, 0.890]. The model also achieved an AUROC of 0.85 [0.78, 0.90] and 0.94 [0.936, 0.941] at scan level and slice level, respectively for the detection of PE.
conclusionThe development of an AI model and its use for the identification of pulmonary embolism will support healthcare workers by reducing the rate of missed findings and minimizing the time required to screen the scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.