Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36368968›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Women's perceptions of cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia: a qualitative study.

Lene Musfelt Nielsen, Maria Guldbrandt Hauge, Anne S Ersbøll, Marianne Johansen, Jesper James Linde, Peter Damm, Karoline Kragelund Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lene Musfelt NielsenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria Guldbrandt HaugeDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne S ErsbøllDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marianne JohansenDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper James LindeDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter DammDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karoline Kragelund NielsenHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark. karoline.kragelund.nielsen@regionh.dk.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKSteno Diabetes Center · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreeclampsia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease later in life, but studies suggest that women with previous preeclampsia are not aware of this. Little is known about how these women perceive the condition and the associated long-term risks. We examined the experiences and perceptions of preeclampsia and the increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life among Danish women with previous preeclampsia and their attitudes towards CVD risk screening.

methodsTen individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with women with previous preeclampsia. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsWe identified six themes: 1) Experiences and perceptions of being diagnosed with preeclampsia, 2) Awareness about increased risk of CVD later in life, 3) Knowledge as a precondition for action, 4) The perception of CVD risk as being modifiable, 5) Motivators for and barriers to a healthy lifestyle, and 6) Screening for CVD. Awareness of the severity of preeclampsia was limited prior to being diagnosed. Particularly among those with few or no symptoms, preeclampsia was perceived as a non-severe condition, which was further reinforced by the experience of having received very little information. Nonetheless, some women were shocked by the diagnosis and feared for the health of the offspring. Many women also experienced physical and psychological consequences of preeclampsia. Awareness of the increased risk of later CVD was lacking; yet, when informed, the women considered this to be essential knowledge to be able to act accordingly. The risk of future CVD was perceived to be partly modifiable with a healthy lifestyle, and the women expressed a need for counselling on appropriate lifestyle changes to reduce CVD risk. Other factors were also mentioned as imperative for lifestyle changes, including social support. The women were generally positive towards potential future screening for CVD because it could provide them with information about their health condition.

conclusionsAfter preeclampsia, women experienced a lack of knowledge on preeclampsia and the increased risk of CVD later in life. Improved information and follow-up after preeclampsia, including guidance on CVD risk reduction and support from health professionals and family, are warranted.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPre-EclampsiaFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansLife StylePregnancyRisk FactorsCardiovascular diseasePreeclampsiaQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36368968
PMCPMC9650891
OpenAlexW4308804302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.