Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36368761›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

LIMPER trials: immediate mobilisation versus 2-week cast immobilisation after distal radius fracture treated with volar locking plate - a study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

Laura Kärnä, Antti P Launonen, Teemu Karjalainen, Toni Luokkala, Ville Ponkilainen, Lauri Halonen, Mika Helminen, Ville M Mattila, Aleksi Reito

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05150925 (Immediate Mobilization Versus 2 Weeks Cast Immobilization After Distal Radius Fracture Treated With Volar Locking Plate - a Study Protocol for a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05150925 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Immediate Mobilization Versus 2 Weeks Cast Immobilization After Distal Radius Fracture Treated With Volar Locking Plate - a Study Protocol for a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTampere University HospitalRan2021 to 2027Enrolled240ConditionsDistal Radius FractureArmsCast treatment, Immediate mobilization, Volar plating
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura KärnäTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland laura.karna@pshp.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-3417-3420
Antti P LaunonenTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3125-0171
Teemu KarjalainenCentral Finland Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Toni LuokkalaCentral Finland Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Ville PonkilainenCentral Finland Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-4560
Lauri HalonenSouth Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland.
Mika HelminenHealth Sciences, Research Services, Tampere, Finland.
Ville M MattilaTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Aleksi ReitoTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-6461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpen reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate has become the most common fixation method in the treatment of unstable distal radius fracture (DRF). There is, however, no consensus as to whether or for how long a wrist should be immobilised after operative treatment. To date, there have been relatively few studies that have evaluated the effect of immediate postoperative mobilisation on functional outcomes. The aim of postoperative rehabilitation is to obtain a good function and to reduce impairment, recovery time, socioeconomical costs and absence from work. Therefore, there is a need for studies that evaluate the optimal method of postoperative rehabilitation to optimise wrist function and return to work. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in which a total of 240 working-age patients who undergo volar plating for DRF will be randomly assigned to either an early mobilisation group or a postoperative 2-week casting group. The aim of the study will be to compare early postoperative outcomes between the study groups. The primary outcome will be patient-rated wrist evaluation at 2 months after operation. A coprimary outcome will be the total length of sick leave. Our follow-up period will be 1 year, and secondary outcomes will include pain, patient satisfaction, perceived ability to work and complications identified at different time points. We expect those patients who undergo immediate mobilisation will have at least as rapid a return to work and function as those patients who undergo postoperative immobilisation, indicating/meaning that there will be no need for postoperative casting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be conducted according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement. The Ethics committee of Tampere University Hospital has approved the protocol. Ethics committee approval number is R21111, and it is accepted on 7 September 2021. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05150925.

Indexed as

Radius FracturesBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansInfant, NewbornPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeHand & wristORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYTrauma management

Identifiers

PMID36368761
PMCPMC9660569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.