Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36368749›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial.

Christian Morath, Anita Schmitt, Michael Schmitt, Lei Wang, Christian Kleist, Gerhard Opelz, Caner Süsal, T Hien Tran, Sabine Scherer, Vedat Schwenger and 29 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05365672 (An Open, Randomized-controlled, Multi-center Phase-II Clinical Trial of Individualized Immunosuppression With Intravenously Administered Donor Modified Immune Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05365672 phase2recruitingnot on this map

An Open, Randomized-controlled, Multi-center Phase-II Clinical Trial of Individualized Immunosuppression With Intravenously Administered Donor Modified Immune Cells (MIC) Compared to Standard-of-care in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorTolerogenixX GmbHRan2022 to 2028Enrolled126ConditionsKidney TransplantationArmsMIC, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Christian Morath *TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany christian.morath@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-7817
Anita Schmitt *TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael SchmittTolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lei WangTolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian KleistTolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gerhard OpelzTolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Caner SüsalInstitute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
T Hien TranInstitute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabine SchererInstitute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Vedat SchwengerDepartment of Nephrology, Transplant Center, Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stephan KemmnerTransplant Center, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1242-4914
Michael FischerederDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Manfred StanglDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Ingeborg A HauserDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Claudia SommererDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian NusshagDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian KälbleDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claudius SpeerDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-5916
Louise BenningDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian BischofsDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sandra SauerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maria-Luisa SchubertDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander KunzDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Angela Hückelhoven-KraussDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Brigitte NeuberDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arianeb MehrabiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6163-1525
Constantin SchwabInstitut of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rüdiger WaldherrInstitut of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anja SanderInstitut of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christopher BüschInstitut of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
David CzockDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Georg A BöhmigDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jochen ReiserDepartment of Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Axel RoersInstitute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carsten Müller-TidowDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter TernessTolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin ZeierTolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volker Daniel *Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias Schaier *TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DEKoç University · TRMedical University of Vienna · ATRush University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDonor-derived modified immune cells (MIC) induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor in preclinical models of transplantation. In a phase I clinical trial (TOL-1 Study), MIC treatment resulted in a cellular phenotype that was directly and indirectly suppressive to the recipient's immune system allowing for reduction of conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we describe a protocol for a randomised controlled, multicentre phase-IIb clinical trial of individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor MIC compared with standard-of-care (SoC) in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty-three living donor kidney transplant recipients from six German transplant centres are randomised 2:1 to treatment with MIC (MIC group, N=42) or no treatment with MIC (control arm, N=21). MIC are manufactured from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of MIC treatment together with reduced conventional immunosuppressive therapy in terms of achieving an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared with SoC 12 months after MIC administration. Key secondary endpoints are the number of patient-relevant infections as well as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction or death. Immunosuppressive therapy of MIC-treated patients is reduced during follow-up under an extended immunological monitoring including human leucocyte antigen-antibody testing, and determination of lymphocyte subsets, for example, regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) and antidonor T cell response. A Data Safety Monitoring Board has been established to allow an independent assessment of safety and efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been provided by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (AFmu-580/2021, 17 March 2022) and from the Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany (Vorlage-Nr. 4586/02, 21 March 2022). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients and respective donors prior to enrolment in the study. The results from the TOL-2 Study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals and will be presented at symposia and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05365672.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsLeukocytes, MononuclearLiving DonorsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStandard of CareImmunosuppressive Agentsimmunologynephrologyrenal transplantationtransplant medicine

Identifiers

PMID36368749
PMCPMC9660568
OpenAlexW4308797473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.