Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36368495›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2023

Optimized rectification of fiber orientation density function with background threshold.

Hunter G Moss, Andreana Benitez, Jens H Jensen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hunter G MossCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Andreana BenitezCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Jens H JensenCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America. Electronic address: jense@musc.edu.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Quantitative Neuroimaging Assessment of White Matter Integrity in the Context of Aging and ADR01AG054159 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Andreana Benitez · 2017 to 2026
$8.9M
Assessing Brain Microstructure in Alzheimer's Disease with Advanced Diffusion MRIRF1AG057602 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FALANGOLA, MARIA F, JENSEN, JENS H · 2018 to 2018
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054159NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe an optimized fiber orientation density function (fODF) rectification procedure that removes negative values and absorbs all features below a specified threshold into a constant background. THEORY AND

methodsThe fODF for a white matter imaging voxel describes the angular density of axons. Because of signal noise and Gibbs ringing, fODFs estimated with diffusion MRI may take on unphysical negative values in some directions and contain spurious peaks. In order to suppress such artifacts, an fODF rectification procedure is proposed that both eliminates all negative values and incorporates all features below a specified threshold, η, into a constant background while at the same time minimizing the mean square deviation from the original, unrectified fODF. Calculating this fODF is straightforward, and the directions and shapes of peaks not absorbed into the background are preserved. The rectification method is illustrated for an analytic fODF model and for experimental diffusion MRI data obtained in healthy human brain, with the original fODFs being obtained from fiber ball imaging.

resultsExamples of optimal rectified fODFs are given for three choices of the background threshold referred to as minimal rectification (η = 0), average-level rectification (η ≈ 0.08), and fractional-anisotropy-axonal-based rectification (η ≈ 0.1). As η is increased, artifacts and other small features are more strongly suppressed, but the major fODF peaks are largely unaffected for the range of η values illustrated by these three alternatives.

conclusionArtifactual features of fODFs estimated with diffusion MRI can be effectively suppressed by applying the proposed optimized rectification procedure. Since it minimizes fODF distortion in the mean square sense, it may be useful in the study of how fODF fine structure is affected by aging and disease.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedWhite MatterAnisotropyBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansArtifactsAxonfiber ball imagingfiber orientation density functionRectificationWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID36368495
PMCPMC9695117
OpenAlexW4308545221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.