Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36368167›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2022

The impact of COVID-19 and rapid policy exemptions expanding on access to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD): A nationwide Veterans Health Administration cohort study.

Nicholas A Livingston, Michael Davenport, Michael Head, Rachel Henke, Lavonia Smith LeBeau, Teresa B Gibson, Anne N Banducci, Alexis Sarpong, Saketh Jayanthi, Clara Roth and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas A LivingstonNational Center for PTSD, Behavioral Sciences Division, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; US Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: nicholas.livingston@va.gov.
Michael DavenportData Science Core, Boston CSPCC, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael HeadIBM Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rachel HenkeIBM Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lavonia Smith LeBeauIBM Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Teresa B GibsonIBM Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anne N BanducciUS Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; National Center for PTSD, Women's Health Sciences Division, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexis SarpongBoston VA Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Saketh JayanthiBoston VA Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Clara RothBoston VA Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica Camacho-CookIBM Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Frank MengData Science Core, Boston CSPCC, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Justeen HydeCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, USA; General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Norah Mulvaney-DayDepartment of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mackenzie WhiteIBM Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Daniel C ChenData Science Core, Boston CSPCC, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael D SteinHealth Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, MA, USA.
Risa WeisbergUS Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; BehaVR, Inc, Elizabethtown, KY, USA.
Boston University · USIBM (United States) · USBoston VA Research Institute · USCambridge Health Alliance · USVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn March 2020, Veterans Health Administration (VHA) enacted policies to expand treatment for Veterans with opioid use disorder (OUD) during COVID-19. In this study, we evaluate whether COVID-19 and subsequent OUD treatment policies impacted receipt of therapy/counseling and medication for OUD (MOUD).

methodsUsing VHA's nationwide electronic health record data, we compared outcomes between a comparison cohort derived using data from prior to COVID-19 (October 2017-December 2019) and a pandemic-exposed cohort (January 2019-March 2021). Primary outcomes included receipt of therapy/counseling or any MOUD (any/none); secondary outcomes included the number of therapy/counseling sessions attended, and the average percentage of days covered (PDC) by, and months prescribed, each MOUD in a year.

resultsVeterans were less likely to receive therapy/counseling over time, especially post-pandemic onset, and despite substantial increases in teletherapy. The likelihood of receiving buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone was reduced post-pandemic onset. PDC on MOUD generally decreased over time, especially methadone PDC post-pandemic onset, whereas buprenorphine PDC was less impacted during COVID-19. The number of months prescribed methadone and buprenorphine represented relative improvements compared to prior years. We observed important disparities across Veteran demographics.

conclusionReceipt of treatment was negatively impacted during the pandemic. However, there was some evidence that coverage on methadone and buprenorphine may have improved among some veterans who received them. These medication effects are consistent with expected COVID-19 treatment disruptions, while improvements regarding access to therapy/counseling via telehealth, as well as coverage on MOUD during the pandemic, are consistent with the aims of MOUD policy exemptions.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineCOVID-19Opioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentVeterans HealthAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneBuprenorphineCOVID-19MethadoneNaltrexoneOpioidsOpioid use disorderTreatmentVeteransVeterans Health Administration

Identifiers

PMID36368167
PMCPMC9624112
OpenAlexW4308036465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.