ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2022
"
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring State- and Individual-Level Characteristics Associated with Perceived Barriers to Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Among Young Adult Black Women.Journal of sex research · 2026Article
- Patient- and Public-Led Research - How Is It Defined and Practiced: A Scoping Review.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- The Role of Race in Pregnancy, Hypertension, and Long-Term Outcomes.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- "So that I can trust them with my body:" How people with low incomes who may become pregnant define and prioritize quality reproductive health care.Contraception · 2024Article
- My Health in My Hands: Improving Medication Abortion Knowledge and Closing Disparities with a Community-Led Media Intervention.Health equity · 2024Article
- Emotional, informational, and decision-making support needs among people seeking abortion in the US: perspectives from All-Options Talkline callers.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023Article
- "Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
- Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme CourtFrontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
- Community-led research for reproductive justice: Exploring the SisterLove Georgia Medication Abortion project.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional family planning research has excluded Black and Latinx leaders, and little is known about medication abortion (MA) among racial/ethnic minorities, although it is an increasingly vital reproductive health service, particularly after the fall of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.