Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367941›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Fragment-based computational design of antibodies targeting structured epitopes.

Mauricio Aguilar Rangel, Alice Bedwell, Elisa Costanzi, Ross J Taylor, Rosaria Russo, Gonçalo J L Bernardes, Stefano Ricagno, Judith Frydman, Michele Vendruscolo, Pietro Sormanni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reprogrammed SimCells for antimicrobial therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A comprehensive overview of recent advances in generative models for antibodies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mauricio Aguilar RangelCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4768-9031
Alice BedwellCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
Elisa CostanziDepartment of Bioscience, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy.
Ross J TaylorCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
Rosaria RussoDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20122, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0011-5775
Gonçalo J L BernardesCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-8917
Stefano RicagnoDepartment of Bioscience, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6678-5873
Judith FrydmanDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2302-6943
Michele VendruscoloCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-1610
Pietro SormanniCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6228-2221
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Milan · ITStanford University · US

Funding

PROTEIN FOLDING IN THE EUKARYOTIC CYTOSOLR01GM056433 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Judith Frydman · 1997 to 2026
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo design methods hold the promise of reducing the time and cost of antibody discovery while enabling the facile and precise targeting of predetermined epitopes. Here, we describe a fragment-based method for the combinatorial design of antibody binding loops and their grafting onto antibody scaffolds. We designed and tested six single-domain antibodies targeting different epitopes on three antigens, including the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Biophysical characterization showed that all designs are stable and bind their intended targets with affinities in the nanomolar range without in vitro affinity maturation. We further discuss how a high-resolution input antigen structure is not required, as similar predictions are obtained when the input is a crystal structure or a computer-generated model. This computational procedure, which readily runs on a laptop, provides a starting point for the rapid generation of lead antibodies binding to preselected epitopes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCOVID-19Antibody AffinityAntigensEpitopesHumansModels, MolecularSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigensEpitopesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36367941
PMCPMC9651861
OpenAlexW4308915416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.