Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367848›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Influence of public hesitancy and receptivity on reactive behaviours towards releases of male Wolbachia-Aedes mosquitoes for dengue control.

May O Lwin, Zoe Ong, Chitra Panchapakesan, Anita Sheldenkar, Li Ting Soh, Irene Chen, Xiaoxi Li, Weixin Niah, Kathryn Vasquez, Shuzhen Sim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Wolbachia-carrying Aedes mosquitoes for preventing dengue infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TargetingViruses · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

May O LwinWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Zoe OngWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Chitra PanchapakesanWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Anita SheldenkarWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Li Ting SohEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Irene ChenEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Xiaoxi LiEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Weixin NiahEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Kathryn VasquezEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Shuzhen SimEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.
Lee-Ching NgEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-3863
National Environment Agency · SGNanyang Technological University · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Singapore, a highly urbanized Asian tropical country that experiences periodic dengue outbreaks, is piloting field releases of male Wolbachia-carrying Aedes aegypti mosquitoes with the aim of suppressing urban populations of the primary dengue vector Aedes aegypti. This study proposes and assesses a model to explain the roles of hesitancy and receptivity towards Project Wolbachia-Singapore in influencing reactive mosquito prevention behaviors (reactive behaviors) towards the release of Wolbachia-Aedes mosquitoes for residents living in the release sites. Interestingly, both hesitancy and receptivity predicted greater instances of reactive behaviors. The model also examines the roles of general knowledge about Wolbachia technology, perceived severity of mosquito bites, perceived density of mosquitoes, and social responsibility as predictors of hesitancy, receptivity, and reactive behaviors towards the release of Wolbachia-Aedes mosquitoes. Hesitancy towards the project mediated the effects of general knowledge, perceived severity of mosquito bites, and perceived density of mosquitoes on reactive behaviors towards the releases, although receptivity towards the project did not. Having less knowledge about Project Wolbachia-Singapore was associated with higher hesitancy towards the project and higher likelihood of performing reactive behaviors towards the releases. Individuals who perceive mosquito bites to be more severe and think that there are more mosquitoes in their living environments were also more likely to be hesitant about the project and practice reactive behaviors. However, both hesitancy and receptivity towards the project mediated the effect of social responsibility on reactive behaviors. Receptivity towards the project was driven by social responsibility, which was also associated with reduced hesitancy towards the project. Our findings suggest that, to address the hesitancy reported by a minority of participants, future outreach efforts should focus on strengthening the public's sense of social responsibility and on tailored education campaigns targeting groups with low levels of knowledge of the project.

Indexed as

AedesDengueInsect Bites and StingsWolbachiaAnimalsHumansMaleMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID36367848
PMCPMC9651544
OpenAlexW4308914457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.