ArticleNeuro-oncology2023
Incidence proportion and prognosis of leptomeningeal disease among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Association of recurrence patterns and outcome with HR and HER2 status in patients with resected brain metastases from breast cancer.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Intrathecal nivolumab in metastatic solid tumors with leptomeningeal disease: dose escalation part of the multicenter IT-PD1/NOA-26 phase 1 trial.Nature cancer · 2026Article
- Characterization of focal leptomeningeal extension in patients with brain metastases: A novel entity.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes in leptomeningeal disease with or without brain metastasis: insights from an explorative data analysis of the Charité LMD registry.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Leptomeningeal metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Leptomeningeal Disease: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Development of a Prognostic Score in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Treated for Meningeal Carcinomatosis.The breast journal · 2025Article
- Case Report: Unlocking opportunities in HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates for bulky leptomeningeal metastatic breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus review on clinical management and future directions.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- The Spectrum of Headache in Leptomeningeal Metastases: A Comprehensive Review with Clinical Management Guidelines.Current pain and headache reports · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a relatively uncommon manifestation of advanced cancer. Patients with LMD carry a poor prognosis and often decline rapidly, complicating inclusion in clinical trials. Identification of LMD subsets of greater incidence and more favorable prognosis might facilitate dedicated clinical trials in the future. We hypothesized that patients with breast cancer may represent such a population and sought to assess the relative incidence and prognosis of LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries.
methodsWe identified 2411 patients with intracranial metastases secondary to breast (N = 501) and non-breast (N = 1910) primaries at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1996 and 2020, of whom 112 presented with and an additional 161 subsequently developed LMD. A log-rank test and Cox modeling were used to compare outcomes in patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries.
resultsAmong patients with newly diagnosed intracranial disease, the incidence proportion of concurrent LMD was 11.4% vs. 2.9% among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (P < .001). Development of LMD among initially LMD-naïve patients was also more common among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (HR = 1.49 [1.05-2.11], P = .03). Patients with LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries displayed lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.70 [0.52-0.93], P = .01; median survival: 5.2 vs. 2.4 months, respectively), with a greater numerical difference observed in patients with LMD at intracranial involvement (7.4 vs. 2.6 months, respectively).
conclusionsPatients with breast cancer and LMD may represent an ideal population for clinical trials given the higher incidence and potentially more favorable prognosis seen in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.