Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367586›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2022

Systematic review on oncologic outcomes on adjuvant endovesical treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in patients with solid organ transplant.

Matthieu Simonet, Ana Dominguez Gutierrez, Angelo Territo, Thomas Prudhomme, Ricardo Campi, Iulia Andras, Michael Baboudjian, Vital Hevia, Romain Boissier, Young Academic Urologist (YAU) E. A. U. Group of Renal Transplantation

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthieu Simonet *Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Urology, University Hospital La Conception, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Ana Dominguez Gutierrez *Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Angelo TerritoOncology and Renal Transplant Units, Puigvert's Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Thomas PrudhommeDepartment of Urology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Ricardo CampiDepartment of Urology, Florence University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Iulia AndrasDepartment of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Michael BaboudjianDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Urology, University Hospital La Conception, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Vital HeviaUrology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Romain BoissierDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Urology, University Hospital La Conception, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. romain.boissier@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-0273
Young Academic Urologist (YAU) E. A. U. Group of Renal Transplantation
Aix-Marseille Université · FRHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHôpital Rangueil · FRIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROPuigvert Foundation · ESUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrothelial carcinoma has a higher incidence in renal transplanted patients according to several registries (relative risk × 3), and the global prognosis is inferior to the general population. The potential impact of immunosuppressive therapy on the feasibility, efficacy, and complications of endovesical treatment, especially Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, has a low level of evidence. We performed a systematic review that aimed to assess the morbidity and oncological outcomes of adjuvant endovesical treatment in solid organ transplanted patients.

methodsMedline was searched up to December 2021 for all relevant publications reporting oncologic outcomes of endovesical treatment in solid organ transplanted patients with NMIBC. Data were synthesized in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity.

resultsTwenty-three retrospective studies enrolling 238 patients were included: 206 (96%) kidney transplants, 5 (2%) liver transplants, and 2 (1%) heart transplants. Concerning staging: 25% were pTa, 62% were pT1, and 22% were CIS. 140/238 (59%) patients did not receive adjuvant treatment, 50/238 (21%) received mitomycin C, 4/238 (2%) received epirubicin, and 46/238 (19%) received BCG. Disease-free survival reached 35% with TURBT only vs. 47% with endovesical treatment (Chi-square test p = 0.08 OR 1.2 [0.98-1.53]). The complication rate of endovesical treatment was 12% and was all minor (Clavien-Dindo I).

conclusionIn solid organ transplanted patients under immunosuppressive treatment, both endovesical chemotherapy and BCG are safe, but the level of evidence concerning efficacy in comparison with the general population is low. According to these results, adjuvant treatment should be proposed for NMIC in transplanted patients as in the general population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellOrgan TransplantationUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalBCG VaccineHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineBCGBladder cancerChemotherapyMitomycinTransplanted patients

Identifiers

PMID36367586
OpenAlexW4308772588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.