Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367580›Full record

ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Expert opinion on the use of transvaginal sonography for presurgical staging and classification of endometriosis.

J Keckstein, M Hoopmann, E Merz, D Grab, J Weichert, S Helmy-Bader, M Wölfler, M Bajka, S Mechsner, S Schäfer and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Pathogenesis of Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Associated Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

J KecksteinEndometriosis Clinic Dres, Jörg und Sigrid Keckstein, Richard Wagner Strasse18, Villach, Austria. joerg.keckstein@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-3300
M HoopmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
E MerzCentre for Ultrasound and Prenatal Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany.
D GrabDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
J WeichertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
S Helmy-BaderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
M WölflerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Endometriosis, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
M BajkaOB/GYN Volketswil, Volketswil, Switzerland.
S MechsnerDepartment of Gynaecology, Endometriosis Centre Charité, Charite Berlin University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
S SchäferDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
H KrentelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bethesda Hospital Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany.
G HudelistDepartment of Gynaecology, Centre for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.
Endometriosis · GBUniversität Ulm · DEAustrian Society of Dermatology and Venereology · ATDeutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynecological ultrasonography plays a central role in the management of endometriosis. The rapid technical development as well as the currently increasing evidence for non-invasive diagnostic methods require an updated compilation of recommendations for the use of ultrasound in the management of endometriosis. The present work aims to highlight the accuracy of sonography for diagnosing and classifying endometriosis and will formulate the present list of key messages and recommendations. This paper aims to demonstrate the accuracy of TVS in the diagnosis and classification of endometriosis and to discuss the clinical applications and consequences of TVS findings for indication, surgical planning and assessment of associated risk factors. (1) Sophisticated ultrasound is the primary imaging modality recommended for suspected endometriosis. The examination procedure should be performed according to the IDEA Consensus. (2) Surgical intervention to confirm the diagnosis alone is not recommended. A preoperative imaging procedure with TVS and/or MRI is strongly recommended. (3) Ultrasound examination does not allow the definitive exclusion of endometriosis. (4) The examination is primarily transvaginal and should always be combined with a speculum and a bimanual examination. (5) Additional transabdominal ultrasonography may enhance the accuracy of the examination in case of extra pelvic disease, extensive findings or limited transvaginal access. (6) Sonographic assessment of both kidneys is mandatory when deep endometriosis (DE) and endometrioma are suspected. (7) Endometriomas are well defined by sonographic criteria. When evaluating the ovaries, the use of IOTA criteria is recommended. (8) The description of sonographic findings of deep endometriosis should be systematically recorded and performed using IDEA terminology. (9) Adenomyosis uteri has sonographically well-defined criteria (MUSA) that allow for detection with high sensitivity and specificity. MRI is not superior to differentiated skilled ultrasonography. (10) Classification of the extent of findings should be done according to the #Enzian classification. The current data situation proves the best possible prediction of the intraoperative situs of endometriosis (exclusive peritoneum) for the non-invasive application of the #Enzian classification. (11) Transvaginal sonographic examination by an experienced examiner is not inferior to MRI diagnostics regarding sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of the extent of deep endometriosis. (12) The major advantage of non-invasive imaging and classification of endometriosis is the differentiated planning or possible avoidance of surgical interventions. The recommendations represent the opinion of experts in the field of non-invasive and invasive diagnostics as well as therapy of endometriosis. They were developed with the participation of the following national and international societies: DEGUM, ÖGUM, SGUM, SEF, AGEM/DGGG, and EEL.

Indexed as

EndometriosisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOvarySensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyDiagnosticsEndometriosis#Enzian classificationRecommendationUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36367580
PMCPMC9837004
OpenAlexW4308768412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.