Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367578›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Differentiating high-grade glioma progression from treatment-related changes with dynamic [

Laura Rozenblum, Timothée Zaragori, Suzanne Tran, Andrea Morales-Martinez, Luc Taillandier, Marie Blonski, Fabien Rech, Damien Galanaud, Aurélie Kas, Antoine Verger

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Manufacturing 6-[Organic letters · 2024
    Article
  7. A bis-boron boramino acid PET tracer for brain tumor diagnosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Added value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura RozenblumDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and LIB, INSERM U1146, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, 47-83 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. Laura.rozenblum@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-8008
Timothée ZaragoriDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Nancyclotep Imaging platform, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Suzanne TranDepartment of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Andrea Morales-MartinezDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Luc TaillandierDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy and CRAN, CNRS UMR 7039, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Marie BlonskiDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy and CRAN, CNRS UMR 7039, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Fabien RechDepartment of Neurosurgery, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Damien GalanaudNeuroradiology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Aurélie KasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and LIB, INSERM U1146, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, 47-83 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Antoine VergerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Nancyclotep Imaging platform, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDiagnostic accuracy of amino-acid PET for distinguishing progression from treatment-related changes (TRC) is currently based on single-center non-homogeneous glioma populations. Our study assesses the diagnostic value of static and dynamic [

methodsWe retrospectively identified 106 patients with suspected glioma recurrences (WHO GIII, n = 38; GIV, n = 68; IDH-mutant, n = 35, IDH-wildtype, n = 71). Patients underwent dynamic [

resultsSurgery or the clinical-radiological 6-month follow-up identified 71 progressions and 35 treatment-related changes. TBR KEY POINTS: • The diagnostic accuracy of dynamic amino-acid PET, for distinguishing progression from treatment-related changes, is currently based on single-center non-homogeneous glioma populations. • This multicentric study confirms the high accuracy of static [

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective Studies[18F]FDOPADynamic analysisGliomaPETRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36367578
OpenAlexW4308775185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.