Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367572›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

Proficiency testing of PIK3CA mutations in HR+/HER2-breast cancer on liquid biopsy and tissue.

Claudia Vollbrecht, Inga Hoffmann, Annika Lehmann, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Jana Fassunke, Svenja Wagener-Ryczek, Markus Ball, Lora Dimitrova, Arndt Hartmann, Robert Stöhr and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathologica · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia VollbrechtCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany. claudia.vollbrecht@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-001X
Inga HoffmannCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.
Annika LehmannCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jana FassunkeFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Svenja Wagener-RyczekFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Markus BallFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lora DimitrovaQuality in Pathology (QuIP GmbH), Berlin, Germany.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Robert StöhrInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Ramona ErberInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nicole PfarrInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lisa BohlmannPathologisches Institut of the Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Andreas JungPathologisches Institut of the Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang DietmaierInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Manfred DietelCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.
David HorstCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.
Michael HummelCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DETechnical University of Munich · DEGerman Agency for Quality in Medicine · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision oncology based on specific molecular alterations requires precise and reliable detection of therapeutic targets in order to initiate the optimal treatment. In many European countries-including Germany-assays employed for this purpose are highly diverse and not prescribed by authorities, making inter-laboratory comparison difficult. To ensure reproducible molecular diagnostic results across many laboratories and different assays, ring trials are essential and a well-established tool. Here, we describe the design and results of the ring trial for the detection of therapeutically relevant PIK3CA hotspot mutations in HR+/HER2-breast cancer tissue and liquid biopsy (LB). For PIK3CA mutation detection in tissue samples, 43 of the 54 participants (80%) provided results compliant with the reference values. Participants using NGS-based assays showed higher success rate (82%) than those employing Sanger sequencing (57%). LB testing was performed with two reference materials differing in the length of the mutated DNA fragments. Most participants used NGS-based or commercial real-time PCR assays (70%). The 167 bp fragments led to a successful PIK3CA mutation detection by only 31% of participants whereas longer fragments of 490 bp were detectable even by non-optimal assays (83%). In conclusion, the first ring trial for PIK3CA mutation detection in Germany showed that PIK3CA mutation analysis is broadly established for tissue samples and that NGS-based tests seem to be more suitable than Sanger sequencing. PIK3CA mutation detection in LB should be carried out with assays specifically designed for this purpose in order to avoid false-negative results.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesEuropeFemaleHumansMutationPrecision MedicineClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanAlpelisibBreast cancerLiquid biopsyPIK3CAProficiency testing

Identifiers

PMID36367572
PMCPMC10067656
OpenAlexW4308771239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.