ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023
NIH research funding success in dermatology training programs, a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers to clinical cosmetic and laser dermatology research in the academic setting by source of funding: a systematic review.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training programs with strong research funding are crucial to academic dermatology and are essential to the development of future dermatology researchers. While previous studies have examined the influence of individual investigator characteristics on funding success, no studies to our knowledge have examined the influence of dermatology training program characteristics on successful receipt of NIH funding. Here, we used publicly available data regarding NIH funding and dermatology training programs to understand the factor influencing successful NIH funding. The results of our study showed strong associations of funding success with the strength of the associated college of medicine, as well as an association with programs having departmental status vs. divisional status. The factors that influence successful funding are multiple, and while many factors cannot be changed or mitigated, our study may provide support to programs who have yet to achieve departmental status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36367569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.