Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367533›Full record

ArticleMolecular carcinogenesis2023

Best practices in surgical and nonsurgical management of head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma: An update.

Daniela Duarte-Bateman, Alan Shen, Taylor Bullock, Payam Sadeghi, Joseph M Escandón, Eliska Dedkova, Brian R Gastman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela Duarte-BatemanLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7628-4113
Alan ShenCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Taylor BullockDepartment of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Payam SadeghiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Joseph M EscandónDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Eliska DedkovaLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Brian R GastmanLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USStrong Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Controversy exists regarding optimal management of MCC as high-quality randomized studies and clinical trials are limited, and physicians are bound to interpret highly heterogeneous, retrospective literature in their clinical practice. Furthermore, the rising incidence and notably poor prognosis of MCC urges the establishment of best practices for optimal management of the primary tumor and its metastases. Herein, we summarized the relevant evidence and provided an algorithm for decision-making in MCC management based on the latest 2021 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Additionally, we report current active MCC clinical trials in the United States. The initial management of MCC is dependent upon the pathology of the primary tumor and presence of metastatic disease. Patients with no clinical evidence of regional lymph node involvement generally require sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) while clinically node-positive patients should undergo fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core biopsy and full imaging workup. If SLNB or FNA/core biopsy are positive, a multidisciplinary team should be assembled to discuss if additional node dissection or adjuvant therapy is necessary. Wide local excision is optimal for primary tumor management and SLNB remains the preferred staging and predictive tool in MCC. The management of MCC has progressively improved in the last decade, particularly due to the establishment of immunotherapy as a new treatment option in advanced MCC. Ongoing trials and prospective studies are needed to further establish the best practices for MCC management.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsyclinical trialsmanagementMCCMerkel cell carcinomaNCCN guidelinesskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID36367533
PMCPMC10098483
OpenAlexW4308773029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.