Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367421›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2022

Predicted and observed impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns: two Health Impact Assessments in Scotland and Wales.

Liz Green, Kathryn Ashton, Mark Bellis, Timo Clements, Margaret Douglas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Liz GreenPolicy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on 'Investment in Health and Well-being', Public Health Wales, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK.
Kathryn AshtonPolicy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on 'Investment in Health and Well-being', Public Health Wales, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK.
Mark BellisPolicy and International Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on 'Investment in Health and Well-being', Public Health Wales, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6980-1963
Timo ClementsDepartment of Public Health and Life Sciences, Bangor University, College Road, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6820-2202
Margaret DouglasUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1560-5451
Bangor University · GBMaastricht University · NLPublic Health Scotland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health Impact Assessment is a key approach used internationally to identify positive or negative impacts of policies, plans and proposals on health and well-being. In 2020, HIAs were undertaken in Scotland and Wales to identify the potential health and well-being impacts of the 'stay at home' and physical distancing measures implemented at the start of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. There is sparse evidence evaluating whether the impacts predicted in HIAs occur following policy implementation. This paper evaluates the impacts anticipated in the COVID-19 HIAs against actual observed trends. The processes undertaken were compared and predicted impacts were tabulated by population groups and main determinants of health. Routine data and literature evidence were collated to compare predicted and observed impacts. Nearly all health impacts anticipated in both HIAs have occurred in the direction predicted. There have been significant adverse impacts through multiple direct and indirect pathways including loss of income, social isolation, disruption to education and services, and psychosocial effects. This research demonstrates the value of prediction in impact assessment and fills a gap in the literature by comparing the predicted impacts identified within the HIAs with observed trends. Post-COVID-19 recovery should centre health and well-being within future policies and decisions. Processes like HIA can support this as part of a 'health in all policies' approach to improve the health and well-being of populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Impact AssessmentCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPolicyWalesCOVID-19evaluationHealth Impact Assessmentssocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID36367421
PMCPMC9651036
OpenAlexW4308918641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.