ArticleHistology and histopathology2022
Primary ectopic meningiomas: Report of 6 cases with emphasis on atypical morphology and exploratory immunohistochemistry.
Article in Histology and histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clear cell meningioma of the lower lumbar spine without dural attachment: A case report.Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the histological and immunohistochemical features of primary ectopic meningiomas (PEMs), especially those of primary ectopic atypical meningiomas (PEAMs). METHODS AND
resultsWe examined 6 cases of PEM, including 2 PEAM cases, which occurred separately in left nasal cavity, left lower lung, right neck, left orbit, right upper lung, and left upper lung by histological and immunohistochemical analysis. In general, of the 6 PEM cases analyzed, 4 cases exhibited morphology of Grade Ⅰ, including 1 fibrous, 1 meningothelial, and 2 transitional variant. The remaining 2 cases shared similar atypical morphology of Grade Ⅱ. The tumors were distributed in sheet-like patterns with loss of architecture of classic meningiomas. Significant hypercellularity, multi-focal necrosis, and thin-walled blood vessels were identified. The mitotic figures were estimated at 6 per 10 high-power fields in one case, and 8 mitotic figures in another. Immunohistochemically, the 6 PEM cases were all positive for Vimentin and EMA, while none showed immunostaining for CKpan, S-100, CD34, STAT6, SMA, Syn or Bcl-2. 4 PEM cases of Grade Ⅰ were immunoreactive for PR but negative for P53, while the 2 PEAM cases displayed negative staining for PR but positivity for P53. As for Ki-67, the positive staining of 4 Grade Ⅰ cases was no greater than 2%, while the positive rates of the 2 PEAM cases were 10% and 20%.
conclusionsOur study has expanded cases of PEMs, especially the 2 PEAM cases in rare sites. Our study has also further summarized the pathological features of PEMs, focusing on the histological features of PEAMs, and the immunohistochemical features worthy of further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36367373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.