Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36367243›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

CAPG: comprehensive allopolyploid genotyper.

Roshan Kulkarni, Yudi Zhang, Steven B Cannon, Karin S Dorman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roshan KulkarniDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Yudi ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Steven B CannonUSDA-Agricultural Research Service, Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Karin S DormanDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-0018

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenotyping by sequencing is a powerful tool for investigating genetic variation in plants, but many economically important plants are allopolyploids, where homoeologous similarity obscures the subgenomic origin of reads and confounds allelic and homoeologous SNPs. Recent polyploid genotyping methods use allelic frequencies, rate of heterozygosity, parental cross or other information to resolve read assignment, but good subgenomic references offer the most direct information. The typical strategy aligns reads to the joint reference, performs diploid genotyping within each subgenome, and filters the results, but persistent read misassignment results in an excess of false heterozygous calls.

resultsWe introduce the Comprehensive Allopolyploid Genotyper (CAPG), which formulates an explicit likelihood to weight read alignments against both subgenomic references and genotype individual allopolyploids from whole-genome resequencing data. We demonstrate CAPG in allotetraploids, where it performs better than Genome Analysis Toolkit's HaplotypeCaller applied to reads aligned to the combined subgenomic references. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and tutorials are available at https://github.com/Kkulkarni1/CAPG.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesSoftwareAllelesGenotypeHeterozygoteHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID36367243
PMCPMC9825759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.